On 4/28/20, shane c wrote:
> I think require/typed/provide in typed/rackunit is affecting the location
> grabbing feature. Hoping someone can provide a suggested path forward. When
>
> I run this program,
>
> #lang typed/racket/base
>
> (require typed/rackunit)
> (check-true (string (check-true (s
I think require/typed/provide in typed/rackunit is affecting the location
grabbing feature. Hoping someone can provide a suggested path forward. When
I run this program,
#lang typed/racket/base
(require typed/rackunit)
(check-true (stringhttps://groups.google.com/d/msgid/racket-users/f3300e51-5
Wait! I got it! I forgot. It’s not hash-lang. I have to choose the language via
the “choose language…” menu.
Sorry for the noise, folks.
John
> On Apr 28, 2020, at 3:28 PM, 'John Clements' via Racket Users
> wrote:
>
> Okay, I have several things to say about Father Time.
>
> Thing one: run
Okay, I have several things to say about Father Time.
Thing one: running through these demos (frtime/demos) is kind of astonishing.
There just doesn’t seem to be enough code for it to do what it’s doing. The
father time programs are *incredibly* concise distillations of behavior. The
ball-pushi
Hi folks,
Here is a by-no-means definitive, and yet hopefully useful library for
working with generators:
https://docs.racket-lang.org/generator-util/index.html
In writing this library, I thought about the cases in which one might use a
generator vs a stream in practice. Since Racket provides suc
Although I haven't tried to use it hands-on, the description of the
imperative flavor makes me think it might be intended to help with this?
https://docs.racket-lang.org/web-server/dispatch.html#%28part._.Imperative_.Dispatch_.Containers%29
p.s. In general you *can* do mutual requires with l
On Tue, Apr 28, 2020 at 11:41 AM Sam Tobin-Hochstadt
wrote:
> I believe you're missing a `defmodule` inside test.scrbl.
>
Aha. Okay, I:
*) Added @defmodule[test] to the test.scrbl file
*) Created a main.rkt that did (require "test.rkt") and (provide
(all-from-out "test.rkt"))
*) Did a raco pkg
I believe you're missing a `defmodule` inside test.scrbl.
Sam
On Tue, Apr 28, 2020 at 11:32 AM David Storrs wrote:
>
> Here's my test code. I get the test.html file out at the end and, as
> expected, the explanation of bar says "Calls foo" with foo in blue with a red
> line underneath. What
Here's my test code. I get the test.html file out at the end and, as
expected, the explanation of bar says "Calls foo" with foo in blue with a
red line underneath. What am I missing?
; test.rkt
#lang racket
(provide (all-defined-out))
(define (foo) 7)
(define (bar) (foo))
--
; test.sc
I'll throw this in simply so that it's part of this thread. There's
nothing new here, so if you've seen my comments in earlier Racket2 threads
then you can skip this.
I've said before and continue to think that getting rid of the parenthesis
syntax is a major error. It is inarguable that there a
On 4/28/20, David Storrs wrote:
> According to what I see in Scribble, both actual examples and in the
> documentation, I had thought that if I did @defproc[func-name] then
> func-name would become a link target and later uses of @racket[func-name]
> would automatically link to that site. I'm cle
According to what I see in Scribble, both actual examples and in the
documentation, I had thought that if I did @defproc[func-name] then
func-name would become a link target and later uses of @racket[func-name]
would automatically link to that site. I'm clearly missing something; my
functions are
Hello everyone and thank you for this very interesting discussion!
I'd like to share my opinion on parenthesized prefix syntax: I actually
switched to Racket/Lisp because of it! This highly uniform structure best
fits the shape of mind as of today.
Now, I explicitly don't pretend to be represe
13 matches
Mail list logo
