Re: [racket-users] Re: quick racket editor survey

On Sat, Feb 29, 2020 at 11:33 PM Hendrik Boom wrote: Sounds like there was more than one microEmacs. Interesting. > Sorry, I was actually talking about Freemacs, but I had forgotten its name. John Cowan http://vrici.lojban.org/~cowanco...@ccil.org We do, doodley do, doodley

Re: [racket-users] Re: quick racket editor survey

On Sat, Feb 29, 2020 at 07:24:19PM -0500, John Cowan wrote: > MicroEmacs was based on MINT ("MINT Is Not Trac"). TRAC is a language > based entirely on macroprocessing, with an implementation written in Perl > at . But there were a lot of other > difference

Re: [racket-users] Re: quick racket editor survey

MicroEmacs was based on MINT ("MINT Is Not Trac"). TRAC is a language based entirely on macroprocessing, with an implementation written in Perl at . But there were a lot of other differences unrelated to Elisp vs. MINT. On Sat, Feb 29, 2020 at 12:56 PM Hen

Re: [racket-users] Re: quick racket editor survey

On Sat, Feb 29, 2020 at 12:01:27PM +0100, Stephen De Gabrielle wrote: > Hi james > > * I noticed several people at Racketcon using, not Aquamacs, but another > GUI version of Emacs. Is there any particular reason to pick one of these > over another?* > > Maybe spacemacs? (I don’t use spacEmacs s

Re: [racket-users] Re: quick racket editor survey

Hi james * I noticed several people at Racketcon using, not Aquamacs, but another GUI version of Emacs. Is there any particular reason to pick one of these over another?* Maybe spacemacs? (I don’t use spacEmacs so I’m only guessing based on the survey response) S. On Thu, 27 Feb 2020 at 21:20,

[racket-users] How to Create a Pollen Markup Alternative in 61 Lines

This is a fun workshop-style post as per the subject line. https://sagegerard.com/making-powerful-racket-markup.html It took a while to figure out how to mix #langs without hitting the filesystem, let alone distill it to a post. If convenient, please play with this for a bit and see if you find