Forwarding this with permission to the kind folks on racket-users…
I’m having a strange problem with raco test; specifically, performing raco test
on a file in a collection from the racket-poppler collection generates error
text very fast… about 3 megabytes per second… with this text (apparently
I'm excited about this one: I put out an experimental release of
unlike-assets/reactive and would love some feedback/shares.
https://sagegerard.com/unlike-assets-reactive-demo.html
TL;DR: That article is about making living builds in Racket, meaning an
expression like (u/a "file.txt" number?) w
I’m interested in converting TeX to picts. It looks like racket-poppler might
be the way to do that.
Unfortunately, I’m having trouble running racket-poppler. I ran into several
problems, but fortunately, all of the problems that I saw were also observed by
the test suite. Running
raco test
Okay, in that case, you really shouldn't add a content-length header. -Jon
On Thu, Feb 20, 2020 at 1:13 PM Bogdan Popa wrote:
>
>
> Jon Zeppieri writes:
>
> > When you stream the response, it doesn't use a chunked transfer encoding?
> > -Jon
>
> The web server chunks all responses on HTTP/1.1 co
I’m sure many other people have something like this, but here’s “Lab 5” from my
currently-running PL course:
https://www.brinckerhoff.org/clements/2202-csc430/Labs/lab5.html
It introduces church numeral encodings and also this kind of true-false
encoding as small programming challenges in Racke
Jon Zeppieri writes:
> When you stream the response, it doesn't use a chunked transfer encoding? -Jon
The web server chunks all responses on HTTP/1.1 connections[1].
I can confirm that the web server works great[2] for streaming uses cases
like long polling!
[1]:
https://github.com/racket/we
When you stream the response, it doesn't use a chunked transfer encoding? -Jon
On Thu, Feb 20, 2020 at 12:40 PM Jay McCarthy wrote:
>
> I assume it is not necessary to be totally accurate, but it is good to when
> you can, because of the Web principle of accepting broad input and producing
> sp
I assume it is not necessary to be totally accurate, but it is good to when
you can, because of the Web principle of accepting broad input and
producing specific output. I don't know of any existing program (like a
proxy or something) that would fail without an accurate length, but it
wouldn't surp
On Monday, December 3, 2018 at 10:49:40 AM UTC-5, Jay McCarthy wrote:
>
> > I don't know if the Racket web server (or related libraries) currently
> provide a way to stream data in the response, but that is something I'll
> definitely need relatively soon (primarily for streaming large CSV/JSON
Hi Ben,
Thank you for your answer.
On Thursday, February 20, 2020 at 3:29:15 AM UTC+1, Ben Greenman wrote:
>
> On 2/19/20, unlimitedscolobb > wrote:
> >
> > []
> >
> > ;Type Checker: Type a could not be converted to a contract because it
> > contains free variables.
> > ; in: a
> >
10 matches
Mail list logo