I understand that there is no law that forbids some ways of XML parsing. :)
My question is in another plain.
Perhaps some other languages have the same realization?
I am trying to understated what purpose it serves? Does this done
intentionally, or this is just random side effect?
For example thi
> On Nov 21, 2019, at 9:51 AM, Kira wrote:
>
> I tested sxml. And it is producer rigth (for me) output.
>
> I feel that this is wrong behavior. Because this " symbols is direct
> part of one and whole element content. And must be read as "\"test qoute\"".
>
> Can please someone explain reason
Hi Kira,
I think this is consistent with how XML is defined. There is a
sequence of character data inside of tags. Character data is
represented by strings in the `xml` library. And there is a sequence
of those.
Jay
--
Jay McCarthy
Associate Professor @ CS @ UMass Lowell
http://jeapostrophe.gith
> On Nov 21, 2019, at 11:21, James Platt wrote:
>
> If we can direct more of the energy of this community into, not just
> improving the documentation, but the way we do documentation, it would be a
> major improvement. Requiring lots of parentheses doesn't bother me. Lack of
> infix notatio
Hello,
I am writing a gui application it is supposed to save the position of the
window and upon restart restore the position.
For this I get the position via overriding the on-move method of frame%.
Upon restoring I call (send frame move x y).
The problem is that on my system (linux manjaro xfc
I have a few questions.
1. Consider XML like this:
test"test qoute"
(string->xexpr "test"test
qoute"")
Will produce this:
'(ROOT () (A () (B1 () "test") (B2 () "\"" "test qoute" "\"")))
The problem is " is parsed as separate entity. You can see that they
added to list of element content as se
On Nov 20, 2019, at 3:31 AM, Jack Firth wrote:
> Would it have helped if the get-directory documentation had included
> examples? Many parts of Racket's documentation are lacking in example code,
> especially the less-commonly-encountered parts.
Indeed, I have previously mentioned the lack of
Hi all,
I normally build Racket from source, and, for 7.5 I decided to try Racket CS as
well.
Racket 7.5 builds fine from minimal source. Racket CS builds fine as well from
minimal source, but, when I run the command to build the rest of the
distribution.
./raco pkg install --de
On Wed, 20 Nov 2019 20:11:09 -0800 (PST)
tbrooke wrote:
> I have been trying to get the path set for racket 7.5 cs on OSX -
> 7.4 cs worked fine
>
> I am not on Catalina yet. I am on Mojave 10.14.6
>
> I renamed the directory I tried adding to paths.d and still no go
>
> I get:
>
> zsh: comm
9 matches
Mail list logo
