Re: [racket-users] Syntax pattern to match a sequence with x identical elements?

2019-10-11 Thread Jonathan Simpson
Thank you Alexis for the clear explanation. I now understand how to use ~between and it is working for me. One small hitch I encountered is a custom syntax class I defined doesn't work in the ~between statement but works elsewhere within the same syntax pattern. This isn't a huge issue for me a

[racket-users] polyglot update + new search-upwards package

2019-10-11 Thread Sage Gerard
Giving away some more code. - polyglot is now version 1.0. Includes a new functional workflow where Markdown+Racket pages can replace themselves entirely [1]. The public API now includes the means to evaluate Racket modules stored in tagged x-expressions (Thanks to Paulo Matos for the suggestio

Re: [racket-users] Syntax pattern to match a sequence with x identical elements?

2019-10-11 Thread wanderley.guimar...@gmail.com
+1 for adding the explanation to the Guide. On Fri, Oct 11, 2019 at 9:02 AM David Storrs wrote: > > Alexis, is there any way that we can get this explanation and some of > the ones you've given me added to the Guide? I've tried to add things > to the documentation before, or even just submit typ

Re: [racket-users] Syntax pattern to match a sequence with x identical elements?

2019-10-11 Thread David Storrs
Alexis, is there any way that we can get this explanation and some of the ones you've given me added to the Guide? I've tried to add things to the documentation before, or even just submit typo reports but, as I've mentioned before, the way the docs are organized (random little snippets scattered

Re: [racket-users] Re: i18n / translations

2019-10-11 Thread Roman Klochkov
It is not possible to translate po-file to string-constants, because msgid "One file removed" msgid_plural "%d files removed" msgstr[0] "%d slika je uklonjena" msgstr[1] "%d datoteke uklonjenih" msgstr[2] "%d slika uklonjenih" cannot be represented in string-constants. And vice versa, (dont-e