tl;dr: You need to use an ellipsis, so your pattern should be ((~between
x:integer 3 3) ...). A (much) more detailed explanation of why follows.
~between is an ellipsis-head pattern. The most common ellipsis-head pattern,
~optional, also works as a plain head pattern, but ~between does not. What
This seems like it should be simple but I've never been able to figure out
how to do this. What I've been doing instead is this:
(x:integer ...+) to match two or more integers.
(x:integer y:integer ...+) to match three or more.
And so on.
I'm at a point now where I need to build patterns dynam
On Thu, Oct 10, 2019 at 2:42 AM Zelphir Kaltstahl <
zelphirkaltst...@gmail.com> wrote:
> … If that works for arbitrary serializable-lambda with only serializable
> parts, I could continue my process pool project.
>
Yes, this would work for any value created by `serial-lambda`.
> The only issue
Hello,
thanks everyone for helping me putting this into a reasonable shape.
My short-term plans with futures-sort are currently to check how various
construct could be improved (or'ing of touched futures is really just a
quick hack for example). Also I'd like to investigate why it didn't work
for
4 matches
Mail list logo
