I've submitted a pull request fixing those errors and supporting
running in serial mode.
One thing I notice is that it's substantially faster than
`vector-sort!` even when run in serial mode on traditional Racket (but
not on Racket CS), so perhaps this should be integrated (or there are
improvemen
One part of me thinks of glorious success of Perl 6 and the rapid
conversion to Python 3.x from Python 2.x ...
... the other part says, "Racket is your research project, you do what you
want to do."
Good Luck and have Fun!
Chris
>
>
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to
Hi Dominik,
I tried to use your package and you are missing a dependency for the
`scribble-math` package in your info.rkt file, this has to be installed
separately otherwise your package won't install.
However, I tried to use the `vector-futures-sort!` function and got an
error:
> (vector-fut
Hi Paulo,
I would be interested to know what your plans are for your Darwin package
(which is a fork of the Frog blog generator, for those who didn't read the
newsletter :-) ).
Over the years several people have updated their copy of Frog with new
features, you can see this on the Network ta
On 10/7/2019 4:30 PM, George Neuner wrote:
Visual Studio's compile and link options are output in log files in
the *.tlog* sub-directory under the build (debug or
release) directory. See *CL.command.?.log* and *link.command.?.log*
where '?' is some number. [I don't know what that number
On 10/7/2019 3:47 PM, Jens Axel Søgaard wrote:
Den man. 7. okt. 2019 kl. 20.15 skrev Hans Sjunnesson
mailto:hans.sjunnes...@gmail.com>>:
I'm sorry Jens - I'm using Visual Studio on Windows to compile
this project.
I've initially built libracket, and SDL, which I'm linking against.
On 10/7/2019 1:46 PM, jab wrote:
Coming across
https://trio.discourse.group/t/structured-concurrency-and-delimited-continuations/
just provoked me to search for discussion of structured concurrency in Racket.
I didn’t immediately find much.* I hope that doesn’t mean that the interesting
wor
Den man. 7. okt. 2019 kl. 20.15 skrev Hans Sjunnesson <
hans.sjunnes...@gmail.com>:
> I'm sorry Jens - I'm using Visual Studio on Windows to compile this
> project.
> I've initially built libracket, and SDL, which I'm linking against.
> I can zip the entire solution and upload it somewhere for you
Can somebody specify how to use racket in jupyter notebook ?
Thanks
On Mon, Oct 7, 2019 at 21:59 jab wrote:
> Yeah, I’d say give a closer read to
> https://vorpus.org/blog/notes-on-structured-concurrency-or-go-statement-considered-harmful/
>
> Excerpting a footnote:
>
> > For those who can't pos
Yeah, I’d say give a closer read to
https://vorpus.org/blog/notes-on-structured-concurrency-or-go-statement-considered-harmful/
Excerpting a footnote:
> For those who can't possibly pay attention to the text without first knowing
> whether I'm aware of their favorite paper, my current list of t
Hi Josh,
Racket has a number of powerful concurrency libraries/extensions that
handle both concurrent execution of code in a single process as well as
parallel execution across multiple processes/hosts. There is the "futures"
library, which might be the most similar to Trio.
https://docs.racket-l
I'm sorry Jens - I'm using Visual Studio on Windows to compile this project.
I've initially built libracket, and SDL, which I'm linking against.
I can zip the entire solution and upload it somewhere for you to have a
look, but you'll need Visual Studio on Windows for that to work.
On Saturday, Oc
Coming across
https://trio.discourse.group/t/structured-concurrency-and-delimited-continuations/
just provoked me to search for discussion of structured concurrency in Racket.
I didn’t immediately find much.* I hope that doesn’t mean that the interesting
work that’s being discussed over in
htt
Yes, that one (combined with the previous commit).
At Mon, 7 Oct 2019 09:23:49 -0700, Stephen Foster wrote:
> Awesome! Thanks. :)
>
> Just for my own curiosity, is it this commit or a different one?
>
> https://github.com/racket/racket/commit/9bb5bc935251e25490dec82f824e1d8e9cd202c
> 9
>
>
>
Awesome! Thanks. :)
Just for my own curiosity, is it this commit or a different one?
https://github.com/racket/racket/commit/9bb5bc935251e25490dec82f824e1d8e9cd202c9
On Sat, Oct 5, 2019 at 6:42 PM Matthew Flatt wrote:
> Thanks for the report and simplification! I've pushed a repair.
>
> At
Hi Cistian,
Both of your examples are hygienic, in the sense that neither actually
do anything that violates macro hygiene.
When `a_definition` is defined in the module context (i.e., the
"global namespace"), it has the same scope as the `a_definition` used
inside `my-macro`. (There's more to it,
Hi,
RN Issue 17 is finally here.
https://racket-news.com/2019/10/racket-news-issue-17.html
Enjoy,
Paulo
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Racket Users" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to racket
Okay, that I am aware of, but why is it hygienic inside of let but *not* in
the global namespace? Also, you should (from my limited understanding!)
still be able to access bindings from inside of a macro, no? For example, I
can call functions inside of a macro and those identifiers are available
I meant to write (less confusing):
"You say you want to use some definitions in your macro, why not just pass
the relevant ones as arguments to your macro?"
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Racket Users" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and sto
Your second macro does not work as you expect, because by default macros in
racket are hygienic, described roughly that means that a macro only
"manipulates" the syntax it is given as arguments, not with the syntax
around its invocation. As gfb has mentioned one way to do this is to use
paramet
Hello,
over the course of past few months I have been tasked with solving a
(real-world) problem of sorting the sums of all possible combinations of
numbers. Some boring accounting stuff revolving around invoices. As the
total number of combinations is 2^N where N is the number of source
numbers,
Hi,
There are multiple potential ways to compile to typed/racket from a custom
language. A few I am aware of:
- roll-your-own macros compiling to typed code (my current solution)
- typed-expander
- turnstile package
Maybe there are others that I don't know of, but how you would do it as an
exp
22 matches
Mail list logo
