On Wednesday, September 25, 2019 at 1:37:41 PM UTC+8, Jesse Alama wrote:
>
> I'm working on building a standalone executable for a #lang that can be
> used in two ways:
>
> 1. foo awesome.foo: execute file awesome.foo, which is written in #lang foo
>
> 2. foo (no arguments): fire up a REPL. Expr
An update to my command line REPL adventures:
I'm still unable to get a working REPL, even when adding more and more
information to raco exe/distribute. Here's my latest attempt:
raco exe ++lang foo ++lang racket/base ++lang racket ++lang brag ++lib
racket ++lib racket/base foo.rkt
I've even t
I think my message below neither asked any question nor did it contain the
adequate politeness which I so much think every e-mail should have. Looking at
it in retrospective, it seems wild that *I* did let a message like that go by.
Do believe me that I'm not saying this because I need help, b
Hi all, I didn't see one in a search so I just added a Stripe API integration
library to the index:
https://pkgd.racket-lang.org/pkgn/package/stripe-integration
- Dependencies are all from base
- Generates and escalates idempotency keys automatically in the event of
network failure
- Includes
On Wed, Sep 25, 2019 at 7:45 PM Alex Harsanyi wrote:
>
> Is there any tunneling involved for connecting to your AWS instance?
>
> There is only one copy of the source port in an IP+UDP datagram, and this
> needs to be whatever the router is using for NAT, otherwise it would not be
> able to rout
Is there any tunneling involved for connecting to your AWS instance?
There is only one copy of the source port in an IP+UDP datagram, and this
needs to be whatever the router is using for NAT, otherwise it would not be
able to route replies back to your machine on the local network. If you
hav
Hi Greg,
On Wed, Sep 25, 2019 at 3:33 PM George Neuner wrote:
>
> Hi David,
>
> On 9/25/2019 1:08 AM, David Storrs wrote:
> What you are overlooking is that UDP is a level 4 [end-to-end] protocol,
> but you are trying to get level 3 [routing] information.
>
> Neither UDP nor TCP normally record
On Wed, Sep 25, 2019 at 2:57 PM Matthew Flatt wrote:
>
> At Wed, 25 Sep 2019 12:49:36 -0400, David Storrs wrote:
> > 1) Is it possible that there is a bug in the underlying C code?
>
> It's always possible. But if I understand the original problem, it
> seems unlikely that a bug manages to exactly
On 9/25/2019 2:57 PM, Matthew Flatt wrote:
At Wed, 25 Sep 2019 12:49:36 -0400, David Storrs wrote:
> 1) Is it possible that there is a bug in the underlying C code?
It's always possible. But if I understand the original problem, it
seems unlikely that a bug manages to exactly reconstruct a po
Hi David,
On 9/25/2019 1:08 AM, David Storrs wrote:
udp-receive! is giving me unexpected results when my local machine ->
router -> server shows the UDP port of the process running on the
local machine instead of the one from the router. I'm not sure how to
get the router's port instead.
NAT
At Wed, 25 Sep 2019 12:49:36 -0400, David Storrs wrote:
> 1) Is it possible that there is a bug in the underlying C code?
It's always possible. But if I understand the original problem, it
seems unlikely that a bug manages to exactly reconstruct a port number
that has been replaced in a UDP packet
On 25. 09. 19 19:32, Ben Greenman wrote:
>> Should I include a brief documentation in
>> scribble-doc/scribblings/scribble/srcdoc.scrbl within the same PR as well?
>
> Yes!
Btw, looking at the struct-doc and struct*-doc descriptions maybe I
should actually provide class-doc and class*-doc forms
> Should I include a brief documentation in
> scribble-doc/scribblings/scribble/srcdoc.scrbl within the same PR as well?
Yes!
And if there are tests for scribble/srcdoc, it'd be good to add some
for `class-doc` before merging
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Hi,
thank you for the quick response.
On 25. 09. 19 17:11, Ben Greenman wrote:
> These changes look great. Can you open a pull request for the
> racket/scribble repo?
>
opened PR#212.
> It looks like:
> - `class?` would be a better contract than `any/c`
Definitely makes sense, as the result
We (my business partner and I) ran tcpdump on the router and
determined that no, it is not using the local port. At first it bound
to 65395 and then after we stopped/started the process it bound to a
different port (49428) as expected.
After a bit of digging in the racket source code I note that
Nice! Many thanks for sharing this.
John
> On Sep 21, 2019, at 2:06 AM, Alex Harsanyi wrote:
>
> A few days ago I posted about adding maps to the DrRacket REPL -- while a
> nice demo, this is not why I implemented the `map-snip%` object. The reason
> I implemented it is because I wanted to a
These changes look great. Can you open a pull request for the
racket/scribble repo?
https://github.com/racket/scribble
Some comments below
> Also I implemented a simple defclass wrapper as a provide form named
> class-doc:
>
> class-doc syntax form
> (define-provide/doc-transformer cl
The output of `make-servlet-tester` returns the HTTP response object that
the servlet returns. `make-servlet-tester` really makes a HTTP connection
to your servlet and is checking the actual result that you sent back. If
the servlet throws an exception, then probably you have the default
exception
On Wed, Sep 25, 2019 at 09:30:07AM -0400, Hendrik Boom wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 24, 2019 at 08:59:31PM +0100, Stephen De Gabrielle wrote:
> > I'm building it now so have a go. Not hopeful because the none of the
> > tests/examples include any files that could be used as bitmap textures. I'm
> > going t
On Tue, Sep 24, 2019 at 08:59:31PM +0100, Stephen De Gabrielle wrote:
> I'm building it now so have a go. Not hopeful because the none of the
> tests/examples include any files that could be used as bitmap textures. I'm
> going to dig deeper because maybe the textures are picts?
>
> Failing that I
On Wed, Sep 25, 2019, 3:16 AM Alex Harsanyi wrote:
> Do you know what port the router is using for NAT? Are you sure that the
> router is not simply choosing the same port, so 25890 is both your local
> port and the port used by the router?
>
I haven't yet 100% ruled it out, but it doesn't look
Hello,
as a heavy user of scribble/srcdoc I've always missed a defclass provide
form equivalent. Therefore I wanted to implement my own. I decided to
use thing-doc as a starting point and noticed that it raises misleading
message if id is not an identifier. Minimal working example follows.
M
Do you know what port the router is using for NAT? Are you sure that the
router is not simply choosing the same port, so 25890 is both your local
port and the port used by the router?
Alex.
On Wednesday, September 25, 2019 at 1:08:16 PM UTC+8, David Storrs wrote:
>
> udp-receive! is giving me
23 matches
Mail list logo
