If "racket" is related to "scheme" by being an illegitimate scheme, I think
"cartel" could be a good choice for "an even more illegitimate scheme". Plus,
it's almost an anagram of racket.
#lang cartel
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Racket Users"
Thanks for the clarification, Neil! Your feedback does help a great deal. I'll
also be happy to share updates with a respectful frequency now that I see the
other replies. :)
~slg
‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐
On Saturday, August 31, 2019 1:04 PM, Hendrik Boom
wrote:
> On Sat, Aug 31, 20
On Sat, Aug 31, 2019 at 02:45:02PM +, Sage Gerard wrote:
> I looked back and found my mistake: I only asked about blog posts and videos.
> I'll refrain from version update posts here from now on.
Whatever you originally asked for, I think this ensuing discussion about
third-party packages is
Sage Gerard wrote on 8/31/19 10:38 AM:
You probably don't want to be slowing yourself down with offering people
previews of new versions, lead times for input, etc.
I'm unknown in open source so
I think all of us in Racket land are pretty much unknown in open source
(outside of Racket/Scheme
Today's version, together with a new README.md file describing my
longer-term intentions, rather than what the program dies right now.
The code resides on a monotone repository on my server, which I hope to
figure out how to make publically accessible.
I haven't written a formal copyrght notice
I looked back and found my mistake: I only asked about blog posts and videos.
I'll refrain from version update posts here from now on.
~slg
‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐
On Saturday, August 31, 2019 10:38 AM, Sage Gerard wrote:
> Hi Neil, and thanks for the helpful information and historic
Hi Neil, and thanks for the helpful information and historical context.
I do have some follow up questions if that's alright, because I want to make
the most out of my time here and it seems like you can clarify that.
> You probably don't want to be slowing yourself down with offering people
>
First, to Sage, thank you for going to the work to open source
third-party packages like this.
Here are a few suggestions that came to mind from this post, which I'd
like to mention to Racket third-party package developers in general.
(Only suggestions, not presuming to tell anyone what to do;
> I haven't been able to find a persistent job queue for Racket, so I thought
> I'd ask if one exists before writing a simple one. I did see Jay's job
> queue package, but it doesn't appear to persist to disk, and that is a
> requirement.
FWIW, I am working on a new Redis client package[1] that
Awesome -thank you for releasing this.
s.
On Wed, Aug 28, 2019 at 11:30 PM Sage Gerard wrote:
> Version 0.2 of the file monitoring package file-watchers is about to
> drop. Here's a PR for public review. There are no contributors, so I plan
> to merge in 48 hours if there is no feedback. Other
10 matches
Mail list logo
