At Thu, 16 May 2019 15:28:10 +0100, Laurent wrote:
> On Wed, May 15, 2019 at 7:05 PM 'John Clements' via Racket Users <
> racket-users@googlegroups.com> wrote:
> > - Racket's IO system has been refactored to improve performance
> > and simplify internal design.
> >
>
> Is it mild overall performa
I’ll compare file write times as soon as we’re done testing the tool I’m
working on.
Cheers
Dex
> On May 16, 2019, at 10:03 PM, Piyush Katariya
> wrote:
>
> I am also keen to know the IO perf optimization results in real world.
>
> Dexter, if possible can you give us some approximate thro
I am also keen to know the IO perf optimization results in real world.
Dexter, if possible can you give us some approximate throughput or latency
numbers when you switch to v7.3
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Racket Users" group.
To unsubscribe f
On 2019-05-15 14:05:48 -0400, 'John Clements' via Racket Users wrote:
> Racket version 7.3 is now available from
For anyone using Ubuntu, the Racket PPA has been updated for 7.3 too:
https://launchpad.net/~plt/+archive/ubuntu/racket
It's available on disco (19.04), cosmic (18.10), bionic (18.0
On Tuesday, May 14, 2019 at 11:23:37 AM UTC-4, Josh Rubin wrote:
>
> It just occurred to me that Haskell could be a powerful way to manipulate
> programs in other languages (like Scheme or Racket). Unfortunately, I don't
> know Haskell. Has anybody been down this path?
>
As John Clements said, R
On Monday, April 29, 2019 at 8:04:09 PM UTC-4, Jay McCarthy wrote:
>
> [Sunday] ... an AWS Lambda runtime, and a few other tools.
>
Excited to hear about this, as it could be a good way to sneak low cost /
high performance Racket code into some of our data pipelines at work.
And if it can work
A huge thanks to everybody who worked on Racket.
IO improvements will surely make everybody’s life a little better in my team
and the whole studio. We’re relying on large (200MB text files), and numerous
(in the 100,000’s) file reads and writes daily. We’re converting shell scripts
to Rac
Thank you all for the new release!
On Wed, May 15, 2019 at 7:05 PM 'John Clements' via Racket Users <
racket-users@googlegroups.com> wrote:
> - Racket's IO system has been refactored to improve performance
> and simplify internal design.
>
Is it mild overall performance improvement, or are ther
This may be of interest:
https://en.wikibooks.org/wiki/Write_Yourself_a_Scheme_in_48_Hours
Though, as others have said, this sounds like a more typical usecase for
racket.
On Tue, May 14, 2019 at 8:23 AM Josh Rubin wrote:
> It just occurred to me that Haskell could be a powerful way to manipul
9 matches
Mail list logo
