Thanks Gustavo,
That was a cool idea. I enjoyed the opportunity to hack on some of the pkg
files.
Unfortunately, I wasn't able to reproduce the error today -- even on my
quarantined machine. I'm not sure if that's because the error pattern
somewhat random or because I've been updating the repos
### About CAM
Computer Assisted Mathematics conference is a forum for scientists
and teachers working in the area of algorithmic mathematics
and interested in promoting of important discrete mathematics
and theoretical informatics ideas into education in technical
universities and schools, includ
On Mar 25, 2019, at 12:49 PM, Matthias Felleisen wrote:
> See how precise the exn message is: 2nd arg of 1st arg of f ~~ not a boolean?
Okay. So the exn message is generated in a systematic way which I can count
on. I didn't realize that. Thanks.
--
You received this message because you
> On Mar 25, 2019, at 12:30 PM, James Platt wrote:
>
>
> On Mar 25, 2019, at 12:05 PM, Matthias Felleisen wrote:
>
>> Your exception handlers may test a contract failure to any level. You can
>> specify this in the predicate part of with-handlers or via match on the exn
>> within the handl
On Mar 25, 2019, at 12:05 PM, Matthias Felleisen wrote:
> Your exception handlers may test a contract failure to any level. You can
> specify this in the predicate part of with-handlers or via match on the exn
> within the handler function. Regexp matching works well here.
It's obvious enoug
> On Mar 25, 2019, at 11:59 AM, James Platt wrote:
>
>
> On Mar 23, 2019, at 5:49 PM, Greg Hendershott wrote:
>
>> But -- contract violations aren't like that. They're about some code
>> surprising some other code. I think the only hope here is, run the
>> code enough (before the user ever d
On Mar 23, 2019, at 5:49 PM, Greg Hendershott wrote:
> But -- contract violations aren't like that. They're about some code
> surprising some other code. I think the only hope here is, run the
> code enough (before the user ever does) to flush out the bad code
> assumptions and fix them. Realist
That looks like exactly what I want. Thanks!
On 23/03/19 8:04 PM, Alex Harsanyi wrote:
>
> The package is called "north" and you can find it here:
>
> https://pkgs.racket-lang.org/package/north
>
> There is also the announcement on Reddit:
>
> https://www.reddit.com/r/Racket/comments/akob56/ann_n
> I am trying to make good use of Generic Interfaces, but can't figure out
if its at all possible to delegate calls up the struct inheritance chain.
So, something like `call-next`
If I understand you correctly, "define/generic" let you do this. See
https://docs.racket-lang.org/reference/struct-
9 matches
Mail list logo
