Jack Firth wrote on 11/10/2017 11:32 PM:
I have to redo my tools once more, and am sick of my current `(doc
...)` and `@doc` format, *and the resulting dependency on McFly.*
Could you elaborate on your experience with this?
A snippet of an example of embedded-docs source file for
"h
>
> I have to redo my tools once more, and am sick of my current `(doc ...)`
> and `@doc` format, *and the resulting dependency on McFly.*
>
Could you elaborate on your experience with this? For a module with
embedded docs I'd want to treat them the same as tests: in a special
submodule which
is an example file. You can also see a screenshot of what it
looks like with some very simple editor support, to help visually
differentiate "code" from docs/metadata (without getting philosophical
any distinction), at:
"http://www.neilvandyke.org/temporary/20171110-racket-example.p
How does a macro properly expand to a define-runtime-path?
The documentation for define-runtime-path says this:
If the form has a source module according to syntax-source-module
,
then the source location is determined by preserving the original expression
as a syntax object, extracting its so
Your intuitions about both questions are right here.
First, type variables are only introduced into scope automatically in
the function body for function definitions. You can use `#:forall`
with `define` to use polymorphic types inline, but that does not allow
you to define a polymorphic store val
fre. 10. nov. 2017 kl. 08.23 skrev Vincent Nys :
> Perhaps http://docs.racket-lang.org/multi-file-lang/index.html can be of
use?
--
--
Jens Axel Søgaard
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Racket Users" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop r
I'm getting surprising results trying to define an abstract polymorphic
type in Typed Racket. Could someone shed some light on this?
Consider the following definitions:
(struct addr ([ptr : Natural]))
(struct (α) store ([next-addr : addr]
[table : (Immutable-HashTa
On Thu, Nov 09, 2017 at 11:23:47PM -0800, Vincent Nys wrote:
Hi,
I have a domain-specific language with a non-parenthesis-based-syntax and
running programs written in this DSL sometimes leads to the creation of
some fairly large data structures. By "large" I mean that it is still
feasible to typ
8 matches
Mail list logo
