Google maps predicts 14 minutes.
https://www.google.com/maps/dir/Hotel+Deca,+4507+Brooklyn+Ave+NE,+Seattle,+WA+98105/Mary+Gates+Hall,+1851+NE+Grant+Ln,+Seattle,+WA+98105/@47.6582455,-122.3156366,16z/data=!3m1!4b1!4m14!4m13!1m5!1m1!1s0x5490148ac590c9fd:0x5ca09aa87f1f39cd!2m2!1d-122.3145465!2d47.661
They do work. They do exactly as advertised in the documentation. As far
as their usefulness goes, I think it is fair to say that they are not as
useful as they could be, or put another way, the set of operations that are
future-safe is too small to make them practical for many folks.
On Mon, Se
Oh. That does seem troubling then.
On Monday, September 11, 2017 at 6:45:45 PM UTC-4, Jon Zeppieri wrote:
>
>
>
> > On Sep 11, 2017, at 6:39 PM, mrmyers.ra...@gmail.com
> wrote:
> >
> > As far as I'm aware, futures usually shouldn't improve performance
> outside of networking or hardware-late
> On Sep 11, 2017, at 6:39 PM, mrmyers.random.suf...@gmail.com wrote:
>
> As far as I'm aware, futures usually shouldn't improve performance outside of
> networking or hardware-latency type situations. The main goal of futures is
> just time-sharing, not improving performance. It doesn't genui
As far as I'm aware, futures usually shouldn't improve performance outside
of networking or hardware-latency type situations. The main goal of futures
is just time-sharing, not improving performance. It doesn't genuinely do
things in parallel, it just interleaves the execution of several things
On Tuesday, September 12, 2017 at 4:46:18 AM UTC+8, Alexis King wrote:
>
>
> Furthermore, if this problem really is a lost cause, what are futures
> actually useful for? The documentation would imply that they are useful
> for lots of number crunching using machine integers or flonums, but
> t
How short of a walk?
I ask because there is about a 30% chance my partner (who is wheel
chair bound) will be going.
~Leif Andersen
On Mon, Sep 11, 2017 at 2:19 PM, Vincent St-Amour
wrote:
> Hi Dave,
>
> We're not planning a shuttle; the hotel is a short walk from the venue.
>
> If that's an is
Yesterday, a user asked a question on Stack Overflow[1] about attempting
to parallelize a solution to the n-queens problem. The program in
question is short, so I can reproduce it here in its entirety:
#lang racket
; following returns true if queens are on diagonals:
(define (check-diagon
Nope, all good; I was just making plans. Thanks for letting me know.
On Mon, Sep 11, 2017 at 2:19 PM, Vincent St-Amour <
stamo...@eecs.northwestern.edu> wrote:
> Hi Dave,
>
> We're not planning a shuttle; the hotel is a short walk from the venue.
>
> If that's an issue for you, please do let us
Hi HiPhish,
This seems like a very cool project! As a long-time vanilla vim user, I'll have
to try neovim and the bindings out.
On 2017-09-11 13:20:11 -, hiph...@openmailbox.org wrote:
> - Why is the documentation not building? I can compile the scribble file
> normally, but running `raco s
Hi Dave,
We're not planning a shuttle; the hotel is a short walk from the venue.
If that's an issue for you, please do let us know.
Vincent
On Mon, 11 Sep 2017 10:35:02 -0500,
David Storrs wrote:
>
> Hi folks,
>
> Is there a shuttle from the hotel to the venue and, if so, what times does it
Hi John,
The plan for Racketeer office hours is to have a town hall / Q&A (like
the one we had last year) in the morning, then more of a hackathon in
the afternoon, where people can bring their projects to get help, or
work together on various tasks to improve our ecosystem.
We specifically desig
Hi folks,
Is there a shuttle from the hotel to the venue and, if so, what times does
it run?
Dave
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Racket Users" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to racket-users+
I think the case here is a little subtle. The syntax object #'(define
x y) has actually gone through expansion, but Racket's new expansion
model will prune this syntax object's local scopes [1]. One could use
#:local [2] in this case to see the difference:
> (syntax-parse (let ([define 'something-
Fair enough. But absence of artifacts in apps you are using right now doesn't
discard the same issue to show up in other apps. Google for 'display artifacts
dpi scaling' or something like that. You'll see that this kind of problem is
actually prevalent.
DrRacket (or underlying libraries) may a
Hello Racketeers,
I wrote a new package, an API client for the Neovim text editor:
https://gitlab.com/HiPhish/neovim.rkt
https://pkgs.racket-lang.org/package/nvim-client
With this it is possible to control Neovim with Racket. In particular,
it is now possible to write Neovim plugins in Racket rat
The transformation that `#lang web-server` does to make serializable
continuations is very invasive, moving things around every-which-way.
I did not try to preserve using the apparent binding occurrence as the
actual binder, so the arrows are odd. I did a little experiments this
morning and couldn'
Racket submissions are *very* welcome at BOB!
BOB Conference 2018
"What happens when we use what's best for a change?"
http://bobkonf.de/2018/en/cfp.html
Berlin, February 23
Call for Contributions
The thing is I don't have any problems with other applications, they all
look good. The gray lines (or "boxes") seems to appear only in DrRacket,
mainly when some part of text is selected (i.e. when it's background is
gray) - the irritating lines shows in moment when I move cursor from the
gray
I really think it is caused by your dpi. Maybe you are suffering from other
similar annoyances too like pixelated icons. Check with no scaling, if
things work fine, it is nothing related to DrRacket, and artifacts like
those you mention could appear on other apps too. You have still several
opt
20 matches
Mail list logo
