On Sunday, July 30, 2017 at 12:35:09 AM UTC+2, Ryan Culpepper wrote:
> On 07/29/2017 02:48 PM, rom cgb wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > Probably due to all operations not being in-place, chaining operations on
> > bignums is very costful.
> >
> > for example, using bitwise-bit-field[1] on bignums is atroc
On 07/29/2017 02:48 PM, rom cgb wrote:
Hi,
Probably due to all operations not being in-place, chaining operations on
bignums is very costful.
for example, using bitwise-bit-field[1] on bignums is atrocious.
I also tried
(define (reverse-bits n)
(for/fold ([reversed 0])
Il giorno 29 luglio 2017, alle ore 20:48, rom cgb ha
scritto:
>Hi,
>Probably due to all operations not being in-place, chaining operations on
>bignums is very costful.
>for example, using bitwise-bit-field[1] on bignums is atrocious.
>I also tried
> (define (reverse-bits n)
> (for/fold ([
Hi,
Probably due to all operations not being in-place, chaining operations on
bignums is very costful.
for example, using bitwise-bit-field[1] on bignums is atrocious.
I also tried
(define (reverse-bits n)
(for/fold ([reversed 0])
([i (in-range (integer-length n))])
On Sat, Jul 29, 2017 at 3:34 AM, Neil Van Dyke wrote:
> As one Racketeer to another, so that old-school people don't think we're
> all newbs...
>
> I beg everyone here to observe long-time Internet "Netiquette" about
> trimming quoted material in email list posts, to the minimum necessary.
> Ofte
As one Racketeer to another, so that old-school people don't think we're
all newbs...
I beg everyone here to observe long-time Internet "Netiquette" about
trimming quoted material in email list posts, to the minimum necessary.
Often, no quoting at all is necessary.
https://en.wikipedia.org/
6 matches
Mail list logo
