> On Jun 29, 2017, at 17:33, Zelphir Kaltstahl
> wrote:
>
> A while ago I started looking at Typed Racket and today I took a look again.
>
> The documentation says:
>
>> Typed Racket provides modified versions of core Racket forms, which permit
>> type annotations. Previous versions of Typed
On Thursday, June 29, 2017 at 11:17:12 PM UTC-4, Philip McGrath wrote:
> I think you might be able to leave the reader as-is and just re-define
> #%datum to reject whatever kinds of literal data you don't want to allow.
>
>
>
> -Philip
>
>
>
> On Thu, Jun 29, 2017 at 9:44 PM, Sam Waxman wro
I think you might be able to leave the reader as-is and just re-define
#%datum to reject whatever kinds of literal data you don't want to allow.
-Philip
On Thu, Jun 29, 2017 at 9:44 PM, Sam Waxman wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I'm building a #lang, and I don't want it to have a few things like
> complex
Thanks for your comments.
The only legal files to upload in this case are plain text, so I'm not too
worried about size. I'm relying on the web-server libraries to deal with
any malicious attempts to send overwhelmingly large files (if that's a bad
idea, I'd definitely appreciate hearing it!). Oth
I don't know the answer to your particular questions with `web-server`
(I've made my own implementations of this in the past), and these
comments might not apply to your particular application, but I'll
mention here for whomever is interested...
It sounds like you're using this, which might pr
Hello,
I'm building a #lang, and I don't want it to have a few things like complex
numbers, or vectors. Other than the things I don't want, the reader would be
identical to racket's. Is there an easy way to "turn off" the things I don't
want, so to speak, and take Racket's reader and delete the
I'm working on a Racket web application for which I need to proxy certain
requests to a non-Racket service over HTTP. I've built a very basic proxy
on top of http-sendrecv/url that works quite well for the most part.
For POST requests, I pass the request-post-data/raw of the original request
as th
A while ago I started looking at Typed Racket and today I took a look again.
The documentation says:
> Typed Racket provides modified versions of core Racket forms, which permit
> type annotations. Previous versions of Typed Racket provided these with a :
> suffix, but these are now only includ
> On Jun 29, 2017, at 09:08, Sam Waxman wrote:
>
> On Thursday, June 29, 2017 at 11:49:49 AM UTC-4, 'John Clements' via
> users-redirect wrote:
>> Oops forgot to cc: list
>>
>>> On Jun 29, 2017, at 08:49, John Clements wrote:
>>>
On Jun 29, 2017, at 08:30, Sam Waxman wrote:
At Thu, 29 Jun 2017 09:32:24 -0700 (PDT), Sam Waxman wrote:
> "The only way to check whether a form is an expression or definition is
> to partially expand it and match on the form."
> - This seems sort of rough to believe. If you shadow the syntax-rule for
> define so that (define id binding) al
Heh, cool, Laurent! This dabbler had missed this until now -- I will read and
probably use.
Cheers, tim
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Racket Users" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to racket-
On Thursday, June 29, 2017 at 11:47:00 AM UTC-4, Matthew Flatt wrote:
> At Thu, 29 Jun 2017 08:10:25 -0700 (PDT), Sam Waxman wrote:
> > One of my constructs, (func name(args) body), defines a function that's
> > able
> > to be called afterwards, and it desugars into a pretty regular define
> > s
On Thursday, June 29, 2017 at 11:49:49 AM UTC-4, 'John Clements' via
users-redirect wrote:
> Oops forgot to cc: list
>
> > On Jun 29, 2017, at 08:49, John Clements wrote:
> >
> >>
> >> On Jun 29, 2017, at 08:30, Sam Waxman wrote:
> >>
> >> Hey all,
> >>
> >> I've been running into a lot of
Am Sonntag, 25. Juni 2017 19:40:08 UTC+2 schrieb philipp.t...@gmail.com:
> Hello its me again,
>
> I have the task to make a funcition who checks if two lists contain a word.
>
> I made a function which does that with one lst but I dont find a way to do it
> with two lists. There must be some ea
Oops forgot to cc: list
> On Jun 29, 2017, at 08:49, John Clements wrote:
>
>>
>> On Jun 29, 2017, at 08:30, Sam Waxman wrote:
>>
>> Hey all,
>>
>> I've been running into a lot of major roadblocks when it comes to writing
>> good tests for some #langs that I've made, for a number of reasons
Looks sort of like a quaternary tree to me. It's the same definition as
your BinaryTree except that there are four branches on each level. They
are in substructures, so maybe it's indirect-quaternary-tree?
As an aside, instead of CamelCase and UPPERCASE, Racket typically names
things in all lowe
At Thu, 29 Jun 2017 08:10:25 -0700 (PDT), Sam Waxman wrote:
> One of my constructs, (func name(args) body), defines a function that's able
> to be called afterwards, and it desugars into a pretty regular define
> statement. [...]
>
> While I don't want this to be allowed, I'd like to catch this
On Thursday, June 29, 2017 at 11:22:38 AM UTC-4, David K. Storrs wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 29, 2017 at 11:10 AM, Sam Waxman wrote:
> Hey all,
>
>
>
> I'm writing a #lang and am trying to raise my own errors instead of having
> racket throw any errors of its own.
>
>
>
> One of my constructs, (fu
Good to know. I'll do it that way.
On Thu, Jun 29, 2017 at 11:26 AM, Philip McGrath
wrote:
> Note, though, (having tried this) that putting a contract on the guard
> will give you undesirable blame behavior unless you use any/c for all the
> domain contracts as Matthias did. The guard must be a
Hey all,
I've been running into a lot of major roadblocks when it comes to writing good
tests for some #langs that I've made, for a number of reasons.
Ideally, I want a function called
(check-eq-program? "program1" "program2")
That will run each program in a fresh module of my #lang, check what
Note, though, (having tried this) that putting a contract on the guard will
give you undesirable blame behavior unless you use any/c for all the domain
contracts as Matthias did. The guard must be able to accept all arguments,
so the server module will be blamed if a client calls the constructor wi
On Thu, Jun 29, 2017 at 11:10 AM, Sam Waxman wrote:
> Hey all,
>
> I'm writing a #lang and am trying to raise my own errors instead of having
> racket throw any errors of its own.
>
> One of my constructs, (func name(args) body), defines a function that's
> able to be called afterwards, and it de
Now that I have figured out how to get `force-cache` to run through alternate
means (using the scroll wheel) and have my preferred font selected, I think
I'll be okay until a fix has been added. I think this started to happen when I
upgraded to v6.9 and then downgraded to v6.8. I couldn't say *w
On Thu, Jun 29, 2017 at 9:50 AM, Matthias Felleisen
wrote:
>
> > On Jun 29, 2017, at 9:21 AM, David Storrs
> wrote:
> >
> > I'd like to create a new exception type, 'exn:fail:insufficient-space',
> something like this:
> >
> > (struct exn:fail:insufficient-space exn:fail (requested available
> s
Hey all,
I'm writing a #lang and am trying to raise my own errors instead of having
racket throw any errors of its own.
One of my constructs, (func name(args) body), defines a function that's able to
be called afterwards, and it desugars into a pretty regular define statement.
As a result, I c
> On Jun 29, 2017, at 9:21 AM, David Storrs wrote:
>
> I'd like to create a new exception type, 'exn:fail:insufficient-space',
> something like this:
>
> (struct exn:fail:insufficient-space exn:fail (requested available source))
>
> I would like to do two things:
>
> 1) Make the exn-message
I'd like to create a new exception type, 'exn:fail:insufficient-space',
something like this:
(struct exn:fail:insufficient-space exn:fail (requested available source))
I would like to do two things:
1) Make the exn-message field be standardized so that the person throwing
the exception doesn't n
(yet another shameless self-promotion, but hopefully this can be of some
help.)
If you really want to add menu items for such small tasks, you can use the
script-plugin [1] which adds a easily modifiable Scripts menu item. There's
already a "Scripts/Utils/Open file directory" menu item there. Feed
28 matches
Mail list logo
