...And now it works for me too. Okay, that was strange.
Sorry to bother everyone.
On Fri, Feb 17, 2017 at 1:55 PM, Shu-Hung You <
shu-hung@eecs.northwestern.edu> wrote:
> This works completely fine on a fresh racket REPL:
>
> > (exn:fail:bmtc:unknown-user "message" (current-continuation-mar
This works completely fine on a fresh racket REPL:
> (exn:fail:bmtc:unknown-user "message" (current-continuation-marks) "bob")
(exn:fail:bmtc:unknown-user "message" # "bob")
I guess there might be some inconsistency in REPL states. Starting a
fresh racket should work, or maybe use (enter! "./modu
Oh. When I change the name to exn:fail:bmtc:unknownuser it works fine. I
guess '-' is a disallowed character for exceptions?
-> (struct exn:fail:bmtc:unknownuser exn:fail:bmtc (username) #:transparent)
-> (exn:fail:bmtc:unknownuser "msg" (current-continuation-marks) "foo")
(exn:fail:bmtc:unkno
I have the following file:
#lang racket
(provide (all-defined-out))
(struct exn:fail:bmtc exn:fail ()
#:extra-constructor-name make-exn:fail:bmtc
#:transparent)
;; I expect this to take all the arguments from exn (its ultimate
superclass), plus a new argument which comes last.
(struct
[ sorry for the long delay in getting back to this ]
On Wed, Oct 19, 2016 at 11:56 AM, Alex Knauth wrote:
>
>> On Oct 19, 2016, at 12:26 PM, Alexis King wrote:
>>
>>> On Oct 19, 2016, at 4:06 AM, Robby Findler
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>> That's the best approach we currently have. Of course, we could s
5 matches
Mail list logo