On Tue, Feb 14, 2017 at 10:05 PM, Matthew Butterick wrote:
>
> On Feb 14, 2017, at 8:36 AM, David Storrs wrote:
>
> (find-system-path 'collects-dir) ;; yields ../collects, which is useless
> /Applications/Racket_v6.6/collects ;; nothing
> /Library/Application Support/ ;; no directory for Racket
> On Feb 14, 2017, at 8:36 AM, David Storrs wrote:
>
> (find-system-path 'collects-dir) ;; yields ../collects, which is useless
> /Applications/Racket_v6.6/collects ;; nothing
> /Library/Application Support/ ;; no directory for Racket
> ~/Library/Application Support/ ;; no directory for Racket
Ah, clever. Thank you, Asumu. Glad to know that this exists.
On Tue, Feb 14, 2017 at 12:33 PM, Asumu Takikawa
wrote:
> On 2017-02-14 12:00:49 -0500, David Storrs wrote:
> >I can't believe there isn't an easy way to do this that doesn't
> require
> >DrRacket. If there are significant f
On Tue, Feb 14, 2017 at 12:16 PM, David Christiansen <
da...@davidchristiansen.dk> wrote:
> On 02/14/2017 12:00 PM, David Storrs wrote:
>
>>
>> I prefer Emacs to Dr Racket
>>
>
> In that case, if you're using racket-mode, you can use
> racket-open-require-path (C-c C-x C-f by default) or M-x
> rac
On Tue, Feb 14, 2017 at 12:14 PM, John Clements
wrote:
>
> > On Feb 14, 2017, at 9:00 AM, David Storrs
> wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> > On Tue, Feb 14, 2017 at 11:41 AM, 'John Clements' via Racket Users <
> racket-users@googlegroups.com> wrote:
> >
> > > On Feb 14, 2017, at 8:36 AM, David Storrs
> wrot
On 2017-02-14 12:00:49 -0500, David Storrs wrote:
>I can't believe there isn't an easy way to do this that doesn't require
>DrRacket. If there are significant functions of a programming language
>that can only be accessed via an IDE then that is a major problem.
In addition to David C
On 02/14/2017 12:00 PM, David Storrs wrote:
I prefer Emacs to Dr Racket
In that case, if you're using racket-mode, you can use
racket-open-require-path (C-c C-x C-f by default) or M-x
racket-find-collection to get to the source of particular import or of a
collection. You can probably find
> On Feb 14, 2017, at 9:00 AM, David Storrs wrote:
>
>
>
> On Tue, Feb 14, 2017 at 11:41 AM, 'John Clements' via Racket Users
> wrote:
>
> > On Feb 14, 2017, at 8:36 AM, David Storrs wrote:
> >
> > I have murphy/protobuf installed and I'd like to look at the source code.
> > How do I fin
On Tue, Feb 14, 2017 at 11:41 AM, 'John Clements' via Racket Users <
racket-users@googlegroups.com> wrote:
>
> > On Feb 14, 2017, at 8:36 AM, David Storrs
> wrote:
> >
> > I have murphy/protobuf installed and I'd like to look at the source
> code. How do I find it?
>
> I think you’re looking for
I have murphy/protobuf installed and I'd like to look at the source code.
How do I find it?
I tried:
(find-system-path 'collects-dir) ;; yields ../collects, which is useless
/Applications/Racket_v6.6/collects ;; nothing
/Library/Application Support/ ;; no directory for Racket
~/Library/Applicati
> On Feb 14, 2017, at 8:36 AM, David Storrs wrote:
>
> I have murphy/protobuf installed and I'd like to look at the source code.
> How do I find it?
I think you’re looking for the ‘collection-file-path’ function, if you want to
do it programmatically.
Alternatively, If you just want to open
I'm not exactly sure what you mean by "feed a type into a macro" or
"the constituent elements .. of a given type". But Typed Racket runs
macro expansion entirely _before_ type checking, so this is unlikely
to be possible.
Sam
On Tue, Feb 14, 2017 at 1:32 PM, Robert Kuzelj wrote:
> Hi Matthias,
>
Hi Matthias,
thanks for answering. As it seems my question was a bit imprecise - let me
rephrase it:
given a type definition in typed/racket like
(define-type BinaryTree (U Number (Pair BinaryTree BinaryTree)))
would it be possible to feed that type into a macro (aka not runtime) so that
A value is a run-time entity, namely, the result of a computation.
A first-class value can flow anywhere within the core language.
A type is a syntactic concept. It does not exist at run-time at all
(contrary to the propaganda concerning ‘dynamic typing’).
> On Feb 14, 2017, at 4:04 AM, Robe
That means: can I inspect the declaration and see all the defined members and
types?
Thanks
Best regards
Robert
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Racket Users" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
15 matches
Mail list logo