I have been reading the docs a lot lately as I have been building a couple
internal tools at my work using Racket. It has been awesome.
The docs are some of the best I have used, second only to maybe the Python
standard docs (for reasons largely unrelated to what I'm posting about here).
My onl
I have been reading the docs a lot lately as I have been building a couple
internal tools at my work using Racket. It has been awesome.
The docs are some of the best I have used, second only to maybe the Python
standard docs (for reasons largely unrelated to what I'm posting about here).
My onl
Matthew Flatt wrote on 01/28/2017 08:45 PM:
You can use `raco pkg config` to set `catalogs`. There's also a
"Settings" panel in DrRacket's "Package Manager..." dialog.
OK, thanks. Setting `raco pkg config --set catalogs` to a non-empty
value seems to work for disabling.
(Were I writing a Ra
You can use `raco pkg config` to set `catalogs`. There's also a
"Settings" panel in DrRacket's "Package Manager..." dialog.
At Sat, 28 Jan 2017 19:45:09 -0500, Neil Van Dyke wrote:
> How does a Racket user prevent Racket tools they run from accessing the
> default package server catalogs, by defa
How does a Racket user prevent Racket tools they run from accessing the
default package server catalogs, by default? And also make Racket use
their own package catalogs, by default?
Probably I'm just not finding one piece of documentation that already
exists?
I see the following encouraging
Hi, All,
Previously I use imapfilter (https://github.com/lefcha/imapfilter) to
process mails from various mailing list. Recently, I use another mail
service, which doesn't support sever side searching, so imapfilter
doesn't work. So I write an IMAP filter with racket net/imap module.
Someone els
Thank you Robby.
Good to know this.
On Sat, Jan 28, 2017 at 9:25 PM, Robby Findler
wrote:
> The pkg-build running here would pick up those changes, tho, so you
> could see the results:
>
> https://plt.eecs.northwestern.edu/pkg-build/
>
> It runs based on the latest snapshot (from
> https://plt
Thank you Matthew.
And, Racket will still be faster than my unstable packages.
On Sat, Jan 28, 2017 at 12:52 PM, Matthew Flatt wrote:
> That sounds like a reasonable addition to `raco test`, and I'll look
> into adding it soon. (The addition won't be effective in
> pkg-build.racket-lang.org unt
The pkg-build running here would pick up those changes, tho, so you
could see the results:
https://plt.eecs.northwestern.edu/pkg-build/
It runs based on the latest snapshot (from
https://plt.eecs.northwestern.edu/snapshots/) instead of the release.
Robby
On Fri, Jan 27, 2017 at 10:52 PM, Mat
9 matches
Mail list logo