On Tue, Jan 24, 2017 at 7:26 PM, Jon Zeppieri wrote:
> Hi David,
>
> On Tue, Jan 24, 2017 at 6:52 PM, David Storrs
> wrote:
>
>> [snip]
>>
>> - When I create the 'monitor this' event, I will need to wrap the sync in
>>> a thread since (sync) is synchronous.
>>
>>
>>
>> If I understand you correc
Thanks Ben, these look great!
On Tue, Jan 24, 2017 at 4:15 PM, Ben Greenman
wrote:
> Hi Racket Users,
>
> I ordered a bunch of Racket stickers to celebrate the 6.8 release. Here's
> proof:
> http://www.ccs.neu.edu/home/types/resources/stickers.jpg
>
> If you send me your address, I will mail you
Hi David,
On Tue, Jan 24, 2017 at 6:52 PM, David Storrs
wrote:
> [snip]
>
> - When I create the 'monitor this' event, I will need to wrap the sync in
>> a thread since (sync) is synchronous.
>
>
>
> If I understand you correctly, you're considering creating a separate
thread for each directory t
Stickers? For free?? Count me in! How would you like me to contact you in
private?
On Tuesday, January 24, 2017 at 1:15:59 PM UTC-8, Ben Greenman wrote:
>
> If you send me your address, I will mail you some stickers. For free!*
>
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the
I mentioned before that I'm writing a system to watch the filesystem for
changes. I'm finishing that up and I have a few questions about
concurrency issues.
1) How do I determine what a safe maximum number of threads is?
2) I think that (fold-files) is the best way to walk a directory tree,
sin
Yo! This conversation has gone seriously off-topic. Can y'all carry it on
with some other subject line?
--Mitch
On Tue, Jan 24, 2017 at 11:38 AM, Tim Chase wrote:
> Here is an interesting alternative: https://www.opencpu.org.
>
> You communicate with R processes via JSON. So, you wouldn't want
Hi Racket Users,
I ordered a bunch of Racket stickers to celebrate the 6.8 release. Here's
proof:
http://www.ccs.neu.edu/home/types/resources/stickers.jpg
If you send me your address, I will mail you some stickers. For free!*
I'm thinking 4 stickers per request (2 rectangles, 2 circles), but if
Racket version 6.8 is now available from
http://racket-lang.org/
- Racket sports a new logo, courtesy of Matthew Butterick.
- MacBook Pro laptops with touch bars are supported.
- Support for FreeBSD on PowerPC.
- Initial support for GTK3 on Wayland is available. GL contexts, GC
blits, an
I have a keybinding (or rather, a script menu item) that inserts the
following into the interaction window:
(require (only-in racket/enter dynamic-enter!)
(only-in syntax/location quote-module-path))
(dynamic-enter! (quote-module-path main))
then I just press enter and the 'main submodu
In Greg Hendershott's racket-mode for Emacs, the "run" command will run
the submodule that's under the cursor. Something similar that would let
one right-click a submodule to run it in DrRacket would be quite nice.
/David
On 01/24/2017 12:17 PM, Robby Findler wrote:
There's not a simple way
Ok, thanks for the quick answer, Robby. I don't have time currently to try
anything deep either, unfortunately.
On Tue, Jan 24, 2017 at 5:17 PM, Robby Findler
wrote:
> There's not a simple way to do that right now, but I think a change to
> the code to make that more configurable would be great.
There's not a simple way to do that right now, but I think a change to
the code to make that more configurable would be great.
It is probably best to make this as a change to DrRacket proper and
support a cleaner interface all around. It might be nice to be able to
click on things in the interacti
Hi all,
Currently we can choose what submodules to run via the 'Choose Language...'
settings.
I'd like to make a keyboard shortcut that executes the current module but
first asks the user what submodules she wants to run.
So far I found
(add-drs-function "run" (λ (frame) (send frame execute-cal
Here is an interesting alternative: https://www.opencpu.org.
You communicate with R processes via JSON. So, you wouldn't want a lot of
back-and-forth, but I can see doing some setup logic and data prep in Racket,
then sending off the JSON request, then interpreting the results. OpenCPU
happens
Reminder!
The final deadline for PLDI W&T proposals is coming up on January 30.
Please see the PLDI website for more information.
http://conf.researchr.org/track/pldi-2017/pldi-2017-workshops-and-tutorials.
Tobias Grosser
PLDI Publicity Chair
--
You received this message because you are subscri
Hi David,
Indeed it does!! Thanks for your help.
Sean
On Monday, January 23, 2017 at 7:16:58 PM UTC, David K. Storrs wrote:
> Hi Sean,
>
> Does (byte-ready?) work for your case?
>
> https://docs.racket-lang.org/reference/Byte_and_String_Input.html?q=peek#%28def._%28%28quote._~23~25kernel%29._b
16 matches
Mail list logo
