Strangely I can't get the example working from the docs and serial lambda isn't
a cakewalk ether. So if you got a working example please share it!
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Racket Users" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving
> On Jan 16, 2017, at 8:06 PM, Alexander McLin wrote:
>
> I am not sure, that there is a benefit to creating a .NET package for
> Racket. Will the benefits justify the development investment?
I think so. I see where you’re going and you may get enough mileage out of this
to get a useful com
I understand where you're coming from. My organization is flexible and isn't
ideologically committed to one particular platform. Microsoft's community
promise is just that, a promise. It can be changed or revoked at any time in
the future.
I've been encouraging adoption of open system practices
Thank you Matthias for the historical information, it was interesting to learn
that a porting project was sponsored by Microsoft in .NET's early days. Were
any papers describing the efforts published?
Porting Racket to .NET definitely is ambitious and as you have said, it seems
unlikely .NET ha
> On Jan 16, 2017, at 00:31, Andreas Olsson wrote:
>
> I've never done serialisation befor. I have to learn that then. :-)
Well, quoting is one form of serialization, so in some sense, you *have*… I
would definitely echo others, though, in suggesting that using ‘eval’ here is a
not-at-all-goo
It looks like there’s a race condition—actually, I think I’m abusing this
term—that occurs when the handin server runs out of memory while
(re-)evaluating a checker module. Specifically, it appears that following such
a failure, subsequent attempts to check this assignment simply enter a stalled
Thanks! I may wait for the next Racket release to test it out, so I won't
know for a while whether this fixes my main issue, but I'm pretty sure it
will.
On Mon, Jan 16, 2017 at 8:13 AM, Matthew Flatt wrote:
> Hi Rohin,
>
> Sorry for the long delay! I've pushed a repair for this bug.
>
> Matthew
This doesn't help anyone who's committed fully to a platform, but if one
is not, or when one has the opportunity to evolve, it should be mentioned...
When an organization emphasizes real open systems (which currently
probably means HTTPS Web services, talking in XML or JSON, and perhaps
SQL, a
At one point I was looking for Racket on .NET and the closest I could find was
the following:
https://github.com/Graham-Pedersen/IronPlot
(it looks like its original name was IronRacket) and a scheme:
https://github.com/leppie/IronScheme
I have only just recovered them from my saved bookmarks and
Hi Rohin,
Sorry for the long delay! I've pushed a repair for this bug.
Matthew
At Fri, 23 Sep 2016 16:04:29 -0700 (PDT), Rohin Shah wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I've been trying to create a namespace and then import it at a different
> phase, but I can't get it to work. Basically, it seems like an issue w
MS asked us (mostly NEU) to investigate a port of Racket (then PLT Scheme) to
.Net some 15 years ago. (They supported the 4-year project with a generous
financial donation.) In the end, we had to admit defeat. Racket’s GUI framework
(e.g, event spaces), its mapping to the control stack (continu
Hi Matthew,
Sorry for the delay in replying.
On Sun, 15 Jan 2017 07:40:05 -0700, Matthew Flatt
wrote:
>Do you know how much memory the process was using when it crashed?
Unfortunately I don't. As I said, I am not the administrator of this
server ... I was informed about the crash a few days
I've never done serialisation befor. I have to learn that then. :-)
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Racket Users" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to racket-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
Fo
13 matches
Mail list logo
