[racket-users] Re: POST requests never bound?

2016-11-07 Thread Luke
And minutes after posting the question, the solution emerges. Answer here for any other scheme illiterates that stumble over this. [("sign-in") #:method "post" sign-in-post] Thank you Rubber Ducky! Luke -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Racket

[racket-users] Re: POST requests never bound?

2016-11-07 Thread Luke
On Monday, November 7, 2016 at 11:15:59 PM UTC-8, Luke wrote: > I'm sure I've missed something incredibly simple here, but I can't seem to > get a POST handler to work at all. > > ```scheme > #lang racket >

[racket-users] POST requests never bound?

2016-11-07 Thread Luke
I'm sure I've missed something incredibly simple here, but I can't seem to get a POST handler to work at all. ```scheme #lang racket

Re: [racket-users] Declaring structs as final?

2016-11-07 Thread Jack Firth
On Monday, November 7, 2016 at 11:19:22 AM UTC-8, David K. Storrs wrote: > Out of curiosity, why do you want this? Some context: https://github.com/jackfirth/lens/issues/290 -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Racket Users" group. To unsubscribe from th

Re: [racket-users] Declaring structs as final?

2016-11-07 Thread David Storrs
Out of curiosity, why do you want this? On Mon, Nov 7, 2016 at 1:27 PM, Alex Knauth wrote: > > > On Nov 4, 2016, at 4:58 PM, Sam Tobin-Hochstadt > wrote: > > > > Here's an example: > > Oh, so this only raises an error when creating an *instance* of y, not > when creating the struct-type for y.

Re: [racket-users] Declaring structs as final?

2016-11-07 Thread Alex Knauth
> On Nov 4, 2016, at 4:58 PM, Sam Tobin-Hochstadt wrote: > > Here's an example: Oh, so this only raises an error when creating an *instance* of y, not when creating the struct-type for y. Is there any way to make it raise an error on the make-struct-type call? Alex Knauth > #lang racket >

Re: [racket-users] Of editors and mere mortals

2016-11-07 Thread Asumu Takikawa
On 2016-11-05 06:14:34 -0700, Ken MacKenzie wrote: > And particularly if you use emacs, what add ons or setup do you do for racket > or scheme editing in general. Since you're also a vim user, you may like evil-mode in emacs. It's a very good vim emulation mode. I find that emacs+evil is a better

Re: [racket-users] Re: Why would delete-file fail without throwing?

2016-11-07 Thread David Storrs
The problem has mysteriously fixed itself, despite the fact that I didn't change anything about the code that was being run -- I did all the work in a separate file and then added things back until I reached the original code. If my co-founder hadn't been standing over my shoulder being just as pu