On Tue, Sep 6, 2016 at 8:50 PM, Jon Zeppieri wrote:
>
>
>
> The `(lambda s ...)` is variable-arity, but when you call `ss` internally
> [...]
>
Sorry, I realized after that your `ss` function essentially *is* a wrapper
around your `subsets` function -- which is exactly what I was suggesting.
Howe
On Tue, Sep 6, 2016 at 7:30 PM, Sanjeev Sharma wrote:
> Thanks, that's helpful
>
> I am having trouble coming up with a quick and easy shorthand to recur on
> the rest parameter - is there a standard way to cdr down this list without
> an intermediary helper function that takes out the raise-nest
Until this thread today, I wasn't even aware the AWS package could be
used with GCS.
It was a fair amount of work to update things to use v4 sig a year ago:
https://github.com/greghendershott/aws/milestone/5?closed=1
If only I'd known, I could have used GCS compatibility as an excuse
not to do
Thanks, that's helpful
I am having trouble coming up with a quick and easy shorthand to recur on the
rest parameter - is there a standard way to cdr down this list without an
intermediary helper function that takes out the raise-nesting-depth effect?
Recursion on the base define (the one with
> On Sep 6, 2016, at 11:59 AM, 'John Clements' via Racket Users
> wrote:
>
>
>> On Sep 6, 2016, at 11:40 AM, 'John Clements' via Racket Users
>> wrote:
>>
>>
>>> On Sep 6, 2016, at 11:19 AM, 'John Clements' via Racket Users
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>> I’m in the process of updating some old code
Le mardi 6 septembre 2016 20:39:37 UTC+2, Sam Caldwell a écrit :
> I'm not sure what it is you want. Do you want the reduction relation to be
> deterministic? If so then you need to decide which order is the "right" one.
>
> You can do this by adding a "lifted-less expression" to your grammar
Th
> On Sep 6, 2016, at 11:40 AM, 'John Clements' via Racket Users
> wrote:
>
>
>> On Sep 6, 2016, at 11:19 AM, 'John Clements' via Racket Users
>> wrote:
>>
>> I’m in the process of updating some old code that used the PLaneT version of
>> aws to communicate with google cloud storage (yes, g
Just wondering if creating a module always has to be based on a .rkt file?
Would there be any way to create, say, modules (one or more) in an org-mode
file, perhaps one module per babel code block? . . . Trying to get org-mode to
be more "modular."
--
You received this message because you are
> On Sep 6, 2016, at 11:19 AM, 'John Clements' via Racket Users
> wrote:
>
> I’m in the process of updating some old code that used the PLaneT version of
> aws to communicate with google cloud storage (yes, google cloud storage
> apparently uses the s3 protocol). Using the current aws package
I'm not sure what it is you want. Do you want the reduction relation to be
deterministic? If so then you need to decide which order is the "right" one.
You can do this by adding a "lifted-less expression" to your grammar, such
as
(define-extended-language simple+lifted+hole+temp simple+lifted
;
I’m in the process of updating some old code that used the PLaneT version of
aws to communicate with google cloud storage (yes, google cloud storage
apparently uses the s3 protocol). Using the current aws package with Google
Cloud Storage yields responses looking like this:
root@cp-test-class:/
I don’t use the GUI stuff much, so take this with a grain of salt,
but my guess is that you will definitely want to use framework if
you need syntax coloring. The color:text% component does a lot of
work to implement syntax coloring on top of the relatively primitive
text% component (which is actua
The framework classes are very likely to pay off for that application.
I used them toward a similar end in the `slideshow-repl` package.
At Tue, 6 Sep 2016 03:29:30 -0400, Neil Van Dyke wrote:
> If I want to write a GUI program with a simple syntax-colored text
> language for a UI[*]... do I want
Hi all!
I'm trying out redex, and I defined a simple language with (define v e)
statements. I also defined an extended language, which allows expressions to be
(lifted v' e'). A (lifted v' e') expression is replaced by v', and a definition
(define v' e') is lifted to the top-level, just before
On Tue, Sep 6, 2016 at 1:15 AM, Jens Axel Søgaard
wrote:
> Dave wrote:
> > I'm on OSX 10.11. I'm working on a spreadsheet application, and my
> current plan is to have each cell be
> > represented as a separate text control.[1]
>
> This potentially leads to many controls (even with your optimiza
On Mon, Sep 5, 2016 at 3:03 PM, Robby Findler
wrote:
> I haven't seen buttons in spreadsheet cells in excel, but maybe I'm
> taking your words too literally?
>
Ah, sorry, I phrased that poorly. I'm thinking of things like the header
on a column, which you can click to make it sort that column.
On Sun, 4 Sep 2016 10:36:21 -0700 (PDT), Sanjeev Sharma
wrote:
>two "x" 's also work
>
>(define list (lambda x x))
(lambda x x x) works because the evaluation of the middle x is a side
effect which is ignored. It still will work if you change it to,
e.g., (lambda x 'q x) or (lambda x 42 x) ...
On Monday, September 5, 2016 at 10:54:57 PM UTC+5:30, Matthias Felleisen wrote:
> The easiest and proper fix is to write typed macros for typed modules. Below
> is a naive but straightforward solution. It would be better if
> define-memoized fished out the type declaration for f and used it to ad
Dave wrote:
> I'm on OSX 10.11. I'm working on a spreadsheet application, and my
current plan is to have each cell be
> represented as a separate text control.[1]
This potentially leads to many controls (even with your optimization in
footnote [1]).
Consider displaying (a section of) the spreads
If I want to write a GUI program with a simple syntax-colored text
language for a UI[*]... do I want to use just `editor-canvas%`, or will
the additional work of using `framework` save me a lot of work in the end?
[*] One frame, consisting only of a text editor, with line-oriented
language syn
20 matches
Mail list logo
