On Apr 17, 2016, at 10:42 AM, Luke Stark wrote:
>
> Well then, I guess it's up to me to get to a point with Racket that we're
> honor-bound to contribute. ;)
A nobler way of putting it. You still have months to start your Racket-based
business and make an honorable contribution to RacketCon.
> On Apr 16, 2016, at 3:20 PM, Robby Findler
> wrote:
>
> And in response to Quico, I would say that what's happening here is
> that read-line (and therefore read-words/line) are interpreting a
> "line" to be a bunch of characters followed by a specific set of
> delimiters (a newline in the exa
In the release candidate, this program:
#lang htdp/isl
(+ 4 4)
(+ 3 4)
(+ 5 6)
Produces the output
8711
Rather than
8
7
11
Is this a bug?
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Racket Users" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving em
On 2016-04-18 03:47:45 +0800, WarGrey Gyoudmon Ju wrote:
>And here is another question. Developing GUI Application involves typed
>class system heavily, which makes the compiling time terribly long (if
>this is the root cause).
It's possible that typed classes are slowing down typechec
On Sun, Apr 17, 2016 at 3:35 PM, Asumu Takikawa wrote:
> If you can send me whatever code is necessary to reproduce the bug (even if
> it's not very minimal), I can try to fix it.
>
Thank you Asumu for caring about this bug.
But now I cannot reproduce it in the real world code either, just like
On Saturday, April 16, 2016 at 4:20:16 PM UTC-6, Robby Findler wrote:
> And in response to Quico, I would say that what's happening here is
> that read-line (and therefore read-words/line) are interpreting a
> "line" to be a bunch of characters followed by a specific set of
> delimiters (a newline
On Sunday, April 17, 2016 at 12:41:57 PM UTC-4, Matthew Butterick wrote:
> >> I don't want to be hit with a ray-of-shame...gentle or otherwise.
> >>
> >> Please clarify?
> >
> > Probably came across as grumpy, but wasn't...do you instead mean that IF
> > you are making money with Racket, you sho
>> I don't want to be hit with a ray-of-shame...gentle or otherwise.
>>
>> Please clarify?
>
> Probably came across as grumpy, but wasn't...do you instead mean that IF you
> are making money with Racket, you should sponsor RacketCon?
Yes, that is all I meant.
Of course everyone should use Rac
On Sunday, April 17, 2016 at 7:42:36 AM UTC-4, Luke Stark wrote:
> On Tuesday, April 12, 2016 at 11:28:42 PM UTC-4, Matthew Butterick wrote:
>
> > I want to emit a special gamma ray of gentle shame to those Racketeers who
> > use Racket professionally, i.e. make money from it.
>
> This is a som
On Tuesday, April 12, 2016 at 11:28:42 PM UTC-4, Matthew Butterick wrote:
> I want to emit a special gamma ray of gentle shame to those Racketeers who
> use Racket professionally, i.e. make money from it.
This is a somewhat confusing message. I'm trying to figure out a way to work
Racket into
Hi WarGrey,
(sorry for the delayed response)
On 2016-04-09 14:39:31 +0800, WarGrey Gyoudmon Ju wrote:
>So, is it safe to just ignore the non-paired value in instantiate.rkt?
This error is coming up likely due to some bug in the Typed Racket contract
generation code (which is what that instan
11 matches
Mail list logo
