On Thursday, February 25, 2016 at 1:54:42 PM UTC-8, jos.koot wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Trying to check
> spelling in DrRacket for a scrbl document, I get the message that aspell or
> ispell cannot be found. Where can I find it? How to install
> it?
>
> I work with Windows
> 7.
>
> Thanks,
> Jos
as
Hi,
Trying to check spelling in DrRacket for a scrbl document, I get the message
that aspell or ispell cannot be found. Where can I find it? How to install
it?
I work with Windows 7.
Thanks, Jos
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Racket Users" group.
T
If any of you happen to be in the Triangle area of NC, I created a Lisp &
Scheme meetup today:
http://www.meetup.com/Triangle-Lisp-Scheme/
I founded TriFunc in 2009 here, but the broad scope & niche interest has always
been a problem (especially after the Clojure (headquartered in the Triangle)
Probably the documentation should clarify that it only works for the
older specification, then.
Sam
On Thu, Feb 25, 2016 at 1:48 PM, Jay McCarthy wrote:
> The `html` library, however, is specifically for parsing HTML4. HTML5
> is a totally new beast basically unrelated to old HTML. We could
> im
The `html` library, however, is specifically for parsing HTML4. HTML5
is a totally new beast basically unrelated to old HTML. We could
imaginably have a new html library
Jay
On Thu, Feb 25, 2016 at 1:45 PM, Sam Tobin-Hochstadt
wrote:
> Note that HTML4 is quite out of date (from 1999), the most r
Note that HTML4 is quite out of date (from 1999), the most recent HTML
standard from the W3C is here: https://www.w3.org/TR/html/ from 2014.
However, if you plan to reference the standard to build software, the
most useful spec is https://html.spec.whatwg.org/ which is what
browsers and other appli
Thanks Neil. Jay, it seems to me that the html spec at w3.org says that
and can be used as inline elements so that may be a
reasonable change to html-spec.rkt.
On 2/25/2016 11:30 AM, Neil Van Dyke wrote:
Jay McCarthy wrote on 02/25/2016 01:21 PM:
Since you mention "in the wild", I think yo
Thank you! I wasn't aware of the html-parsing library.
Jon
On 2/25/2016 11:21 AM, Jay McCarthy wrote:
You should double check against the HTML 4.01 spec
https://www.w3.org/TR/html4/
Since you mention "in the wild", I think you probably don't want to
use the html library but instead want to u
Jay McCarthy wrote on 02/25/2016 01:21 PM:
Since you mention "in the wild", I think you probably don't want to
use the html library but instead want to use
http://docs.racket-lang.org/html-parsing/index.html
BTW, `html-parsing` package uses SXML, and you'll want to read this
brand-new documen
You should double check against the HTML 4.01 spec
https://www.w3.org/TR/html4/
Since you mention "in the wild", I think you probably don't want to
use the html library but instead want to use
http://docs.racket-lang.org/html-parsing/index.html
Jay
On Thu, Feb 25, 2016 at 1:13 PM, jon stenerso
I find that when I use the html library I have to make a few simple
changes to html-spec.rkt. It seems that and are not treated
like and . You can see in this example that while remains in
the enclosing , does not. I also find that I have to allow
pcdata as a child of and . I don't know
On Wed, Feb 24, 2016 at 7:37 PM, Brian Adkins wrote:
> As I get deeper into Racket, I expect I'll occasionally find a function
> I'm used to having in the standard library of another language missing. I
> can easily create my own packages for this sort of thing, but some of them
> may be useful e
Hello,
is it possible to add custom keybindings with AltGr for keys that normally
don't produce anything with AltGr?
I'm trying the following (on 6.4.0.6--2016-02-08(91d85a1/a))
#lang s-exp framework/keybinding-lang
(keybinding "g:q" (? (x y) (send x insert #\?)))
(keybinding "?:g:q" (? (x
On Thursday, February 25, 2016 at 9:02:07 AM UTC-5, Robert Herman wrote:
> On Thursday, February 25, 2016 at 8:49:41 PM UTC+7, Brian Adkins wrote:
> > On Thursday, February 25, 2016 at 8:36:22 AM UTC-5, Robert Herman wrote:
> > > Cool, Brian!
> > >
> > > I am not able to scroll past the page view.
On Thursday, February 25, 2016 at 8:49:41 PM UTC+7, Brian Adkins wrote:
> On Thursday, February 25, 2016 at 8:36:22 AM UTC-5, Robert Herman wrote:
> > Cool, Brian!
> >
> > I am not able to scroll past the page view. The scroll is bottomed out, but
> > clearly there is more text on your page. I am
On Thursday, February 25, 2016 at 8:36:22 AM UTC-5, Robert Herman wrote:
> Cool, Brian!
>
> I am not able to scroll past the page view. The scroll is bottomed out, but
> clearly there is more text on your page. I am using Firefox to view.
>
> Just curious about your experience with pony lang? I
Cool, Brian!
I am not able to scroll past the page view. The scroll is bottomed out, but
clearly there is more text on your page. I am using Firefox to view.
Just curious about your experience with pony lang? I always come back to Racket!
Rob
On Thursday, February 25, 2016 at 12:06:51 AM UTC+7
Dear Robby,
Thank you for the response.
It is what I expected. I think for current goal typesetting isn't that
important, so I'll define a macro for reduction-relation.
Thank you a lot,
Anton
BR,
Anton Podkopaev
podkopaev.net
On Thu, Feb 25, 2016 at 3:41 PM, Robby Findler
wrote:
> reduction-r
reduction-relation doesn't expand its body, it just looks at it and
processes it. So if you write:
#lang racket
(require redex)
(define-language L
(E ::= (list v ... E e ...) (car E) (cdr E) hole)
(v ::= (list v ...) natural)
(e ::= (list e ...) (car e) (cdr e) natural))
(define-syntax-rul
Dear colleagues,
I'm working on a semantics in Redex, which reduction rules have a lot in
common.
To reduce duplicate code I want to define a macros (say `==>`) for
reduction rule definition.
Unfortunately, I haven't managed to do that:
I've got "reduction-relation: the ==> relation is not defined
20 matches
Mail list logo
