Oh, yes, perhaps I did not understand Symbols well, especially in TEXT MODE.
I don't remember how did I find the solution.
Nonetheless, thank you all the same.
On Tue, Jan 12, 2016 at 2:42 AM, Ismael Figueroa
wrote:
> Maybe it is too late for this, but I run into the same issue just now...
>
>
I'd probably prefer using a fold over explicit recursion. This gets easier if
you split your code into two steps - one that does just one level of lookup,
and one that does nested lookups. Additionally, I'd prefer list indexes rather
than pair lookup functions:
(define (data/ref s key)
(cond
I'd probably prefer using a fold over explicit recursion. This gets easier if
you split your code into two steps - one that does just one level of lookup,
and one that does nested lookups. Additionally, I'd prefer list indexes rather
than pair lookup functions:
(define (data/ref s key)
(cond
Maybe it is too late for this, but I run into the same issue just now...
In my case I get the same error when using:
@include-section["path.rkt"]
but it works when using
@include-section[(submod "path.rkt" doc)]
probably because the scribble/lp2 is not providing the doc submodule
expected by s
Hi Marc,
Most formlets are typed as `(formlet/c (or/c false/c binding?))` where
the `binding?` is returned when the thing is there and the `#f` is
returned when it isn't. However, if you use `required`, then an
exception is thrown on the `#f` because the form element must be
present. Formlets like
5 matches
Mail list logo
