On Wednesday, December 9, 2015 at 6:30:01 PM UTC-8, Alex Harsanyi wrote:
> On Thursday, December 10, 2015 at 9:01:24 AM UTC+8, Emmanuel Oga wrote:
> > On Wednesday, December 9, 2015 at 3:32:24 PM UTC-8, Alex Harsanyi wrote:
> > > On Thursday, December 10, 2015 at 2:33:32 AM UTC+8, Matthew Butterick
On Wednesday, December 9, 2015 at 6:33:02 PM UTC-8, Neil Van Dyke wrote:
> David K. Storrs wrote on 12/09/2015 08:50 PM:
> > 1) Is there a web-spidering package that people recommend? I could use
> > wget and then parse things from disk, but I'd like to have something that's
> > easily composabl
On 12/9/2015 9:35 PM, brendan wrote:
On Wednesday, December 9, 2015 at 6:22:54 PM UTC-5, gneuner2 wrote:
> I *think* Brendan is referring to caching the dispatch path - i.e. once
> you've determined the proper function to call for a set of arguments,
> you cache the arguments (or their relevant c
On Wednesday, December 9, 2015 at 6:22:54 PM UTC-5, gneuner2 wrote:
> I *think* Brendan is referring to caching the dispatch path - i.e. once
> you've determined the proper function to call for a set of arguments,
> you cache the arguments (or their relevant characteristics) and the
> resulting
David K. Storrs wrote on 12/09/2015 08:50 PM:
1) Is there a web-spidering package that people recommend? I could use wget
and then parse things from disk, but I'd like to have something that's easily
composable into CLI scripts.
I've done a lot of Web crawling and scraping successfully with
On Thursday, December 10, 2015 at 9:01:24 AM UTC+8, Emmanuel Oga wrote:
> On Wednesday, December 9, 2015 at 3:32:24 PM UTC-8, Alex Harsanyi wrote:
> > On Thursday, December 10, 2015 at 2:33:32 AM UTC+8, Matthew Butterick wrote:
> >
> > > Here's one good way to promote the language:
> > >
> > > 1)
Hi folks,
I've done a bit of Scheme in the past (although not a lot) and am just getting
started with Racket. Yesterday I tried installing a package -- 'Boris', a web
spider -- and raco crashed with the output shown below.
Two questions:
1) Is there a web-spidering package that people recomme
On Wednesday, December 9, 2015 at 3:32:24 PM UTC-8, Alex Harsanyi wrote:
> On Thursday, December 10, 2015 at 2:33:32 AM UTC+8, Matthew Butterick wrote:
>
> > Here's one good way to promote the language:
> >
> > 1) Make something impressive with Racket.
>
> Not the original poster, but does this
On 09/12/15 21:21, Robby Findler wrote:
> Some of the mixins in the framework may also be interesting to you.
I just realized that there is also a library called "framework", and
that "the framework" wasn't just referring to racket/gui. Excellent!
Thanks again!
/David
--
You received this mess
On Thursday, December 10, 2015 at 2:33:32 AM UTC+8, Matthew Butterick wrote:
> Here's one good way to promote the language:
>
> 1) Make something impressive with Racket.
Not the original poster, but does this count?
https://github.com/alex-hhh/ActivityLog2
it is a fitness tracker for cycli
On 12/9/2015 1:41 PM, Alexis King wrote:
> On Dec 6, 2015, at 10:03 PM, George Neuner wrote:
>
> I would disagree that multiple dispatch isn't needed. The Visitor pattern is
used fairly frequently in real programs and it is just a overly complex,
error-prone way of doing double dispatch. Try
I'll give it a shot with this approach then. Thanks!
/David
On 09/12/15 21:21, Robby Findler wrote:
> You'd need to wire up your table with the after-insert and
> after-delete methods, invalidating the appropriate parts. The behavior
> you seem to want below is simple calls into the data/enumerat
You'd need to wire up your table with the after-insert and
after-delete methods, invalidating the appropriate parts. The behavior
you seem to want below is simple calls into the data/enumerate library
and more interesting invalidation is possible if you wish it.
And you want to look at text%, not
Sorry: data/enumerate => data/interval-map.
On Wed, Dec 9, 2015 at 2:21 PM, Robby Findler
wrote:
> You'd need to wire up your table with the after-insert and
> after-delete methods, invalidating the appropriate parts. The behavior
> you seem to want below is simple calls into the data/enumerate l
Thanks for a fast answer, and for the recommendation!
Right, it's all from the compiler. When the user opens a file, it is
normal text; type checking turns it into an angry fruit salad of
semantic information.
Is there a way to automatically keep these things updated as the user
edits the text? I
My experience with this kind of thing suggests that keeping separate
tables on the side that map ranges in the editor to whatever
information you want is simpler and better. (Eg, check syntax.) Check
out data/interval-map.
You don't want to save this information when the user saves, right?
That is
Hi all,
Summary:
Do I need to do anything over and above defining `get-count' and
`partial-offset' in a custom snip that has multiple items in order to
have it work properly in an editor derived from `text%'?
Details:
I'm in the process of making a library to interface Racket with the
Idris com
> On Dec 6, 2015, at 10:03 PM, George Neuner wrote:
>
> I would disagree that multiple dispatch isn't needed. The Visitor pattern is
> used fairly frequently in real programs and it is just a overly complex,
> error-prone way of doing double dispatch. Trying to handle more than 2
> dimensio
> So, what is the best way?
Neither will help promote the language, I'm afraid.
But if you post your questions on this mailing list, it will bring the list a
little more traffic, and thus, by your reasoning, make it a happier place.
Whereas Stack Overflow will be depressing no matter what.
He
I have several questions about Racket and DrRacket to ask in the next days. I
have a feeling if I ask them on Stackoverflow.com it can be a minuscule
contribution to its promotion as a language (spreading the word), and I can
accept to receive less answers there.
It can contribute also to the i
20 matches
Mail list logo
