Solved, thank you.
The first example explained worked perfectly.
http://docs.racket-lang.org/web-server/dispatch.html
2015-11-05 23:23 GMT-02:00 João Martins :
> How can I adapt this code
> http://docs.racket-lang.org/more/step5.txt
>
> to get Fibonnaci and the value that will be passed in the
Thanks, I've been meaning to do something about this for months!
Do they make use of `default-equiv`?
--
William J. Bowman
On Wed, Nov 04, 2015 at 05:50:01AM -0800, Andrew Kent wrote:
> Dear other PLT Redex users,
>
> Do you have any clever tricks/tools to make testing in PLT Redex
> more pall
How can I adapt this code
http://docs.racket-lang.org/more/step5.txt
to get Fibonnaci and the value that will be passed in the url.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Racket Users" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it
Your teach may intend for you to do it a hard way, but the trivial way
is use the dispatch system:
http://docs.racket-lang.org/web-server/dispatch.html
The first example is more than you need. I suggest asking your teacher
if they had something more complicated (and instructive) in mind
though.
I am doing a university project and need to create a server racket. The purpose
of this server is that from a URL we perform following function, eg:
http: // localhost: 8080 / fibonacci / 10
So when I access this URL, I need to get the string "fibonacci" and the value
10 so you can call the fib
Yes, I agree that Mist is what is out there when I look a things such as
node.js and other works of art that re-discover continuations and friends.
I spent the first N years of my research life thinking and publishing about
continuations. Simple conclusion: call/cc is not it. I introduced deli
On Tue, Nov 03, 2015 at 06:59:15PM -0500, Jon Zeppieri wrote:
> I think it's far more likely to be a bug in my detection code.
>
> So, your /etc/localtime should be a symlink. What path does it point
> to? And, in particular, is the path that it points to absolute or
> relative?
> On my system, I
Is there such a thing as a user-specific but non-version-specific
installation scope for packages? The docs [1] appear to indicate that you
can have user+version-specific or non-user+non-version-specific installs,
but neither of the other two combinations.
The main problem is that it's a (minor) p
It occurs to me that if I treat my file system as a database I am making
assumption about locking and access that may not be consistent across file
systems - but the operations are so fast and writes are so rare that this
is unlikely to be an issue I ever experience with my little web app.
I also
> (struct measure (measuring-proc maximum-proc)
> #:prop prop:procedure (struct-field-index measuring-proc))
>
> (define footrule (measure footrule-proc footrule-maximum))
>
Thanks a lot! I didn't know about this option. That seems like a good
way of embedding the information into the measure
Matthew,
I am reviving this 6-week-old discussion about
raco and runtime paths.
That time, I did not go through with it on Windows.
In my Windows build, I used raco ctool without the --runtime
option, leaving the library tied to absolute paths in the system.
Now I am willing to accomplish the s
First thing, thank you all for the consideration you're giving to my
request.
A bit of background. I'm studying the meaning of continuations and their
role in building useful constructs; think at
generators/iterators/coroutines, as they're coming to JavaScript. I am kind
of smelling already that c
12 matches
Mail list logo
