Re: [racket-users] What has happened to extflonum support in 32-bit nightly builds?

Moreover: I just built Racket from github source on 32-bit Linux with --enable-extflonum switch to ./configure, and the build version somehow misses the extflonums: Actually, not from the github source, but from the snapshot "source + built packages". I guess it should not matter, though. Reg

[racket-users] What has happened to extflonum support in 32-bit nightly builds?

Hello, I vaguely remember that extflonum support was supposed to be turned off by default in 32-bit Linux releases. OK. But current 32-bit Windows nightly builds do not provide it either. I did not notice when they stopped to provide it. Moreover: I just built Racket from github source on 32-bit

[racket-users] Re: regexp question

On Friday, October 30, 2015 at 10:35:19 PM UTC+1, Matthew Butterick wrote: > [[:space:]] and similar matchers also require #px. > > As for the difference between #rx and #px: > > "The pregexp ... procedures produce a regexp value using a slightly different > syntax of regular expressions that is