Michael Titke wrote on 08/03/2015 12:50 AM:
Perhaps /quote/ and /eval/ would do the job? That is the usual way to
treat Scheme code as data and data as Scheme code.
Eval might indeed be the perfect solution this time, iff every other
conceivable alternative has been rejected. :)
Shameless
On 02/08/2015 19:12, Konstantin Weitz wrote:
I'm trying to write a distributed racket program using [places][0]. From my
current understanding, this means that I have to send data to each place over a
channel using the `place-channel-put` function, which can send any value
accepted by `place-m
thanks
same versions - I was trying to see the effects of different gcc optimization
flags, especially with Pict3D & some math.
On Saturday, August 1, 2015 at 10:35:55 PM UTC-4, Matthew Flatt wrote:
> Are you seeing conflicts with different installations that have the
> same version number? O
I'm trying to write a distributed racket program using [places][0]. From my
current understanding, this means that I have to send data to each place over a
channel using the `place-channel-put` function, which can send any value
accepted by `place-message-allowed?`.
I would like to send closure
On 01/08/2015 18:29, Ian Tegebo wrote:
On Wednesday, July 29, 2015 at 8:17:06 AM UTC-7, Michael Titke wrote:
(define (apply-or well-formed-list)
(foldl {lambda (a b) (or a b)}
#f
well-formed-list))
(define (apply-and well-formed-list)
(f
5 matches
Mail list logo
