Sorry, list, for dumb unprofessional question, but I'm not even amateur
programmer)
How can I convert string and floats to bytes, that can be passed to udp-send?
Tried real->floating-point-bytes and string->bytes/utf-8 but it produces not
compatible output.
Any best practices of forming udp dat
Hi Everyone!
For anyone out there who finds IRC too daunting and difficult to use, there's a
slack team created just for racketlang at http://racket.slack.com. Get invites
to the team at http://racket-slack.herokuapp.com.
Cheers,
Jason
--
You received this message because you are subscribed t
Yes, this is a limitation of `raco pkg` that is on my list to repair.
It happens when a file is removed from a linked package, such as the
packages in "pkgs", and only when the corresponding ".zo" file is not
yet deleted. It's not an actual conflict, because `raco setup` will
soon remove the ".zo"
I updated my tree today and ran make, and ran into this error:
raco pkg update: packages conflict
package: compatibility-test
package: racket-test
module path: tests/racket/package
I did a little investigating, and sure enough, I can see that while this file
used to be a part of the racke
I also forgot to reply to the list.
-- Forwarded message --
From: "Doug Williams"
Date: Jul 23, 2015 9:21 AM
Subject: Re: [racket-users] What limits would you put on racket?
To: "Sayth Renshaw"
Cc:
If you're strictly comparing Racket to other Lisp dialects, I would say
there is n
> On Jul 23, 2015, at 2:47 AM, copycat wrote:
>
> Yes, i can and will try with the old imagemagick bindings.
>
> On Thursday, July 23, 2015 at 6:28:00 AM UTC+8, johnbclements wrote:
>>> On Jul 20, 2015, at 4:11 AM, copycat wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi, not sure if this is considered a bug?
>>>
>>> (sen
On Jul 25, 2015, at 2:48 PM, Matthew Flatt wrote:
> Do the broken references show up when rendering docs with `raco setup`
> or `raco pkg {install,update}`, or do they show up when running
> `scribble` directly on the ".scrbl" file?
The former.
> If you're seeing this behavior when using `raco s
Hi all,
Writing TR code, I find that the more I use the Option type, the more I want
something like Haskell’s Maybe monad. Is there any existing tool I’m missing,
that provides for applying functions to values of type (Option x), by
propagating failures?
If not, would it be sensible to include
Hi
Modules racket/streams and srfi/41/streams do not export stream-lazy.
Module srfi/41/streams exports stream-lambda and define-stream.
Module racket/streams does not export these.
When Phil Bewig was preparing his srfi 41,
I had may discussions with him about providing stream-lazy to the user
9 matches
Mail list logo
