Yeah, it's confusing. :(
Robby
On Sat, Jul 25, 2015 at 10:22 PM, Jack Firth wrote:
> Indeed it turns out I was missing something embarrassingly obvious. I was
> looking at the docs for the 2htdp/image functions, but using the pict
> functions.
--
You received this message because you are sub
Indeed it turns out I was missing something embarrassingly obvious. I was
looking at the docs for the 2htdp/image functions, but using the pict functions.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Racket Users" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop r
Where do you see that documentation? This seems to say "diameter":
http://docs.racket-lang.org/pict/Basic_Pict_Constructors.html?q=circle#%28def._%28%28lib._pict%2Fmain..rkt%29._circle%29%29
Robby
On Sat, Jul 25, 2015 at 9:49 PM, Jack Firth wrote:
> So the documentation says that (circle 100) p
On Monday, July 20, 2015 at 5:03:55 PM UTC-7, Jack Firth wrote:
> I'm trying to create a way to automatically turn test cases into examples.
> I'd like a macro that turns this:
>
> (extract-expressions
> (module+ test
>(check-equal? (extract-expression (square 5)) 25)
>(check-equal? (ext
So the documentation says that (circle 100) produces a circle with radius 100.
However, (pict-width (circle 100)) produces 100 instead of 200, so apparently
it's a circle with diameter 100 and radius 50? Is this a misdocumented
function, or am I missing something embarrassingly obvious?
--
You
Crash bandicoot is the one example I know. Is that what you were thinking of?
Sent from my iPhone
> On Jul 25, 2015, at 8:02 AM, Hendrik Boom wrote:
>
>> On Sat, Jul 25, 2015 at 12:04:07AM +, John Carmack wrote:
>> Half-life was written in C on my Quake 1 codebase.
>
> Thank you for the co
At Thu, 23 Jul 2015 15:07:53 -0700, Jordan Johnson wrote:
> What are the appropriate function and the preferred practice for referring to
> struct fields in a Scribble document? For example, if I’m writing the
> defstruct* body text and want to say, “the x field is intended for blah blah
> blah”
At Thu, 23 Jul 2015 19:57:52 -0700 (PDT), copycat wrote:
> On Thursday, July 23, 2015 at 2:50:37 PM UTC+8, copycat wrote:
> > With a list box, i can select multiple items by holding onto my mouse and
> dragging. I'll like to add on other features to the list box like being able
> to drag the rows
Do the broken references show up when rendering docs with `raco setup`
or `raco pkg {install,update}`, or do they show up when running
`scribble` directly on the ".scrbl" file?
If it's the latter, then that makes sense. When you refer to a module
through a filesystem path, Scribble doesn't try to
At Sat, 25 Jul 2015 19:58:05 +, John Carmack wrote:
> Anyone got one handy? Lazily attempting to avoid the day of frustration that
> usually comes from touching anyone else's NDK project...
Untested, but possibly useful:
http://www.cs.utah.edu/~mflatt/tmp/racket-6.2-arm-android-19-in-place
Anyone got one handy? Lazily attempting to avoid the day of frustration that
usually comes from touching anyone else's NDK project...
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Racket Users" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails fro
On 25/07/2015 14:02, Hendrik Boom wrote:
On Sat, Jul 25, 2015 at 12:04:07AM +, John Carmack wrote:
Half-life was written in C on my Quake 1 codebase.
Thank you for the correction. Now I get to wonder what the truth
behind the rumour was. Evidently not half-life.
-- hendrik
There is so
Hi Stephen,
Thanks for testing this. Turns out I had removed a #:opaque in Definition
while cleaning up
the example before sending the mail. Now I get the same error as you.
With
(define-syntax-class Definition
#:opaque
#:literals (define)
(pattern (define (name:Id a:Id ...) body:Body)))
Actually, I dont get the "begin expected" error that you mention. I'm getting:
define: expected identifier
parsing context:
while parsing Id
while parsing Definition
while parsing TopLevelForm in: 4
with the 4 highlighted, which seems correct since it comes from using
the Definition cl
I haven't played with the example in detail, but do you want the cut
operator here?
http://docs.racket-lang.org/syntax/stxparse-patterns.html?q=syntax-parse#%28form._%28%28lib._syntax%2Fparse..rkt%29._~7e!%29%29
On Sat, Jul 25, 2015 at 9:55 AM, Jens Axel Søgaard
wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> The syntax-p
Hi All,
The syntax-parse form can often generate sensible errors based on the
progress made
during the attempt to match a pattern against a syntax-object. Given
multiple choices
the choice where the "maximum" progress was made is used to generate the
error message.
Is there a way to tell syntax-p
On Sat, Jul 25, 2015 at 12:04:07AM +, John Carmack wrote:
> Half-life was written in C on my Quake 1 codebase.
Thank you for the correction. Now I get to wonder what the truth
behind the rumour was. Evidently not half-life.
-- hendrik
--
You received this message because you are subscrib
17 matches
Mail list logo
