Issues fixed and added to catalog, thanks Matthias!
On Saturday, April 25, 2015 at 6:58:22 PM UTC-7, Matthias Felleisen wrote:
> Mira, you exist. I just submitted a bug report after installing the package
> and playing with it. -- Also once you get the tool to work on HEAD, please
> enter it in
Needed a DrRacket upgrade to notice that, thanks Robby!
On Saturday, April 25, 2015 at 5:29:29 PM UTC-7, Robby Findler wrote:
> This looks very nice, thanks!
>
>
> You may wish to use "raco pkg install racketeer" to install and "raco pkg
> remove racketeer" to remove it. These are both availab
Mira, you exist. I just submitted a bug report after installing the package and
playing with it. -- Also once you get the tool to work on HEAD, please enter it
into the catalog so it is easier to install. Thanks, this is really neat and
great to have -- Matthias
On Apr 25, 2015, at 9:43 PM,
NICE!
On Apr 25, 2015, at 8:10 PM, Mira Leung wrote:
> Racketeer is a plugin for DrRacket that integrates continuous testing with
> Racket development. This is aimed primarily at the context of usage within
> university-level programming courses, and has been tested on computer science
> f
This looks very nice, thanks!
You may wish to use "raco pkg install racketeer" to install and "raco pkg
remove racketeer" to remove it. These are both available via drracket's
menus.
Robby
On Saturday, April 25, 2015, Mira Leung wrote:
> Racketeer is a plugin for DrRacket that integrates conti
Racketeer is a plugin for DrRacket that integrates continuous testing with
Racket development. This is aimed primarily at the context of usage within
university-level programming courses, and has been tested on computer science
freshmen and senior students.
Source and more info available at ht
I have a long-running racket server that’s connecting to a MySQL back end. It
has a connection pool wrapped in a virtual connection, created like this:
;; create a connection to the database
(define conn
(virtual-connection
(connection-pool
(lambda ()
(mysql-connect #:database "so
> 2015-04-24 14:44 GMT+02:00 Jens Axel Søgaard :
>
>> The arrows disappear when I use the at-exp syntax: @${b^2-4*a*x}.
>> I am not sure why. Anyone?
>>
>
Thanks to Alexander for submitting a fix.
/Jens Axel
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Racket U
I find:
#lang racket
(require redex)
(define-language jk
(t n
(n + t)
(n + n + t)
(n + n + n + t))
(n number))
(redex-match? jk t 1) ; -> #t
(redex-match? jk t (term (+ 1 1))) ; -> #f
(redex-match? jk t (term (+ 1 1 1))) ; -> #f
(redex-match? jk t (term (1 + 2))) ; ->#t
2015-04-24 14:44 GMT+02:00 Jens Axel Søgaard :
> The arrows disappear when I use the at-exp syntax: @${b^2-4*a*x}.
> I am not sure why. Anyone?
>
I haven't figured it out yet, but it seems to have worked at some point.
I have found this:
(define-syntax ($ stx) (syntax-case stx () [(_ item ...
2015-04-24 14:44 GMT+02:00 Jens Axel Søgaard :
>
> The planet package took a *very* long time to install, so I intend to
> upload a version to pkg.racket-lang.org.
>
The infix package is now available through pkg.racket-lang.org.
/Jens Axel
--
You received this message because you are subscrib
2015-04-24 18:32 GMT+02:00 Jens Axel Søgaard :
>
>
> 2015-04-24 18:25 GMT+02:00 Jos Koot :
>
>> Hi Jens Axel,
>>
>> Thanks for replying and explaining.
>>
>> Can you discriminate between a+b and |a+b| or a|+|b?
>>
>> When I get around to adding |...| identifiers to the lexer, it will work
> like
Hi, I sent a reply to an old bug report (15008) and the mail apparently
didn't arrive. Is the bug tracker working? Should I migrate the bug to
github?
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Racket
Users" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop rece
Hi Matthias,
The only thing I can think of is (side-condition guard)
where the guard would check for the alternation of + and n.
Thanks, Jos
_
From: racket-users@googlegroups.com [mailto:racket-users@googlegroups.com]
On Behalf Of Matthias Felleisen
Sent: sábado, 25 de abril de 201
Redex's term-language is about defining __abstract__ syntax not concrete
syntax.
For the former, the tricks of concrete syntax don't matter.
So let's think, how would you generalize
#lang racket
(require redex)
(define-language jk
(t n
(n + t)
(n + n + t)
(n + n + n + t))
On Saturday, April 25, 2015 01:03:13 PM you wrote:
> On Saturday, April 25, 2015 01:39:54 AM you wrote:
> > On Saturday, April 25, 2015 01:34:59 AM you wrote:
> > > To all,
> > >
> > > I have a project that I'm trying to compile to a single bytecode file
> > > via
> > > (raco demod). I compile a m
On Saturday, April 25, 2015 01:39:54 AM you wrote:
> On Saturday, April 25, 2015 01:34:59 AM you wrote:
> > To all,
> >
> > I have a project that I'm trying to compile to a single bytecode file via
> > (raco demod). I compile a module .rkt file which requires several library
> > module .rkt files.
17 matches
Mail list logo
