Lux wrote on 04/03/2015 05:47 AM:
cgi.assign = ( ".rkt" => "/usr/bin/racket" )
scgi.server = ( ".rkt" => ((
"bin-path" => "/usr/bin/racket",
"socket" => "/tmp/racket.socket"
)))
scgi.debug = 1
-
I don't know how other people feel about someone else putting packages
they wrote into the new package system, but I think it's a problem.
Today marks at least the third time that I was about to move forward
with the new package system, but it just came to a screeching halt, when
I found someo
On Apr 4, 2015, at 5:26 PM, Erik Silkensen wrote:
> Could someone explain how this example works?
>
> $ racket
> Welcome to Racket v6.1.1.
> -> (require racket/sandbox)
> -> (define racket-eval (make-evaluator 'racket))
> -> (define a (racket-eval '(set 1 2 3)))
> -> a
> (set 1 2 3)
> -> (set?
Could someone explain how this example works?
$ racket
Welcome to Racket v6.1.1.
-> (require racket/sandbox)
-> (define racket-eval (make-evaluator 'racket))
-> (define a (racket-eval '(set 1 2 3)))
-> a
(set 1 2 3)
-> (set? a)
#f
-> (define racket-eval-again (make-evaluator 'racket))
-> (equal? a
On Saturday, April 4, 2015 at 5:10:21 PM UTC+2, Andrew Mauer-Oats wrote:
> Notice that not only does the output file fail to open, but also the raco pkg
> show has a similar error. I missed that the first read through.
>
>
> I see you said you installed manually "main-distribution". You could l
Oh, great!
Thanks!
On Apr 4, 2015, at 2:06 PM, Ryan Culpepper wrote:
> On 04/04/2015 01:42 PM, Alexander D. Knauth wrote:
>> Is there a way to define a syntax-class so that for example in:
>> (syntax-parse stx
>> [(_ a:stxcls) ….])
>> It would be able to know that it was used with a, instead
On 04/04/2015 01:42 PM, Alexander D. Knauth wrote:
Is there a way to define a syntax-class so that for example in:
(syntax-parse stx
[(_ a:stxcls) ….])
It would be able to know that it was used with a, instead of for instance b in
b:stxcls?
Is that possible?
If not, would it be a good idea
Is there a way to define a syntax-class so that for example in:
(syntax-parse stx
[(_ a:stxcls) ….])
It would be able to know that it was used with a, instead of for instance b in
b:stxcls?
Is that possible?
If not, would it be a good idea to add?
The reason I ask is that then it might be pos
On Apr 4, 2015, at 11:22 AM, Jos Koot wrote:
> The following puzzles me:
>
> #lang racket
> (define plus +)
> (free-identifier=? #'+ #'plus) ; -> #f
>
> #lang racket
> (define-syntax (a stx)
> (syntax-case stx ()
> ((_) (datum->syntax stx (free-identifier=? #'+ #'plus)
> (define plus
Tree?
Do you mean this?
http://docs.racket-lang.org/mrlib/Hierarchical_List_Control.html?q=button%25
/Jens Axel
2015-04-04 10:30 GMT+02:00 Gour :
>
> Alexander D. Knauth writes:
>
>> Here it is, although some of the things I did like creating objects on a
>> dummy panel and then reparenting t
The following puzzles me:
#lang racket
(define plus +)
(free-identifier=? #'+ #'plus) ; -> #f
#lang racket
(define-syntax (a stx)
(syntax-case stx ()
((_) (datum->syntax stx (free-identifier=? #'+ #'plus)
(define plus +)
(a) ; -> #f
#lang racket
(define plus +)
(define-syntax (a stx)
Notice that not only does the output file fail to open, but also the raco
pkg show has a similar error. I missed that the first read through.
I see you said you installed manually "main-distribution". You could look
into that process. I think you should verify no issues exist before you do
that st
Alexander D. Knauth writes:
> Here it is, although some of the things I did like creating objects on a
> dummy panel and then reparenting them seem like they could be bad ideas.
> https://github.com/AlexKnauth/racket-gui-table
Thank you. I did star it.
What about trees? You don't have need for
Alexander D. Knauth writes:
> For tables, I wrote my own version of some kind of table for racket’s gui
> so that I could use it in a gui latin dictionary I was making.
Thanks. Looks good.
Sincerely,
Gour
--
One is understood to be in full knowledge whose every endeavor
is devoid of desire
Vincent St-Amour writes:
> I have written GUI applications in Racket, .NET, Swing and tk, and
> Racket is the most pleasant by far, IMO.
I'm glad to hear it. Racket, as language, really looks beautiful - simple
syntax and powerful expressibility, afaict.
Do you find Racket's GUI sufficient for
15 matches
Mail list logo
