Making a correction here, my wish error message should say this.
* in: the 1st argument of*
* (->**
*((and/c number? (between/c 0 1)))*
*(#:clamp-range boolean?)*
*number?)*
Because I understand that the phrase *"the range of"* means the last item
in the -> form whic
Actually I wasn't quite ready to move on.
When I apply (curve 3) where (define curve (cubic-bezier a b) a and b are
bezier-control-point?
I get the following contract error:
---
*(curve 3)*
*. . cubic-bezier: contract violat
Good evening Mathias,
After studying your program and mine, and running various permutations, I
understand where I was going wrong. It appears that while doing manual
experimentation I had gotten confused to which module I was actually in the
REPL when calling various functions by hand. Also my te
The open-endedness of this led me to write a bit, then read a few things,
then produce unnecessarily long responses, and so on, so I deleted
everything to spare people. I'll go with saying thanks for the input.
But here's an interesting related link:
http://blog.codinghorror.com/gold-plating/
Re
Yes, that worked. Thank you for the immediate fix.
It was impressive how Racket kept all eight of my iMac’s pseudoCPUs busy while
it was recompiling mischief.
On Oct 3, 2014, at 12:32 PM, Carl Eastlund wrote:
> Byron,
>
> That's an issue I had fixed on a separate branch of the git repository
Byron,
That's an issue I had fixed on a separate branch of the git repository
where "mischief" is stored, but hadn't gotten around to moving to the
branch "raco pkg" uses until earlier today. Your question is quite well
timed. I believe if you run "raco pkg update mischief" you should get a
vers
I’m trying to use the mischief #lang. I did raco pkg install mischief, and I
see I have mischief installed among my Mac Library files.
I created a file with just:
#lang mischief
(define one 1)
When I click the Run arrow, I get error messages:
.undefined: undefined;
cannot use before initiali
I think someone from the Felleisen extended family of researchers will
have something to say on types (both theory and practice) when they get
a chance.
Two very general comments, IMHO:
* Type checking (static, runtime, mixed, other) is one of many
mechanisms and disciplines that can influenc
"the problem is when you re-work the code, do you know for sure that
you moved the contract/assertion/validation/checking appropriately."
That's the real crux that I forgot to say. I was inspired to post when I
was slightly repurposing a mid-level function and realized it no longer had
to do as mu
My opinion: Which will waste less time over all uses of your program? A
few extra CPU-minutes of double checks, or a few extra man-weeks of
debugging when one of your code's assumptions fails?
Sean Kanaley writes:
> Hello all,
>
> Sometimes I run into situations where a callee has certain input
>
in theory only the "top level" things should validate. by which i mean
those things which get input from something other than your own code.
the problem is when you re-work the code, do you know for sure that
you moved the contract/assertion/validation/checking appropriately.
test coverage can he
Hello all,
Sometimes I run into situations where a callee has certain input
constraints that the caller must satisfy. Particularly when the caller is
just below the user interface level, this can lead to redundant checks. For
example, if the the callee takes an integer, and the user input function
i run the hello-world example in distributed-lib but got a socket error.
here is what i did:
1, i have a pc and a VPS
2, i can login the VPS from the pc without password. (ssh)
3, they both running racket6.1
4,i change localhost to the ip of the vps in hello-world.rkt
then i run hell
Forty-year Lisper, three-month Racketeer. I’ve been using Racket to prototype
a weakest precondition static analysis tool for my work at
http://ontopilot.com. (You may recall the “Guardians of the Software Universe”
t-shirt at RacketCon.) I’m thinking about ways to use it at a K-12 charter
sch
14 matches
Mail list logo
