I had not actually heard of Xvfb before now, but that could be a good
solution. I balk at using full X11 with only 512MB of RAM, but that could
be enough to satisfy the original code's expectations. I will have to
experiment with it.
On Mon, Sep 22, 2014 at 9:28 AM, Amir Ansari wrote:
> Have you
Amir Ansari wrote at 09/22/2014 02:28 AM:
Have you tried Xvfb (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Xvfb), a virtual X server? It
runs headlessly, sidesteps the whole issue of having to fork the code...
I have no idea whether "xvfb" is the best way without looking closely at
a particular case, but I
This is what's achievable based on the simpler design with www.youpatch.com
right now (shown at medium resolution). As you can see, this kind of image
leads to heaps of "stair-casing".
I think it would be much nicer to smooth out the jaggies. I'm experimenting
with adding a facility to do this wi
Have you tried Xvfb (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Xvfb), a virtual X server? It
runs headlessly, sidesteps the whole issue of having to fork the code...
Amir
Racket Users list:
http://lists.racket-lang.org/users
Hmm.
Alright, replacing the calls to slideshow with calls directly to pict, as
well as commenting out the racket/gui/base calls successfully gets the code
to run without X.
However, something about how it converts the picts for web isn't working,
so instead of a neat little circle, for instance,
Maybe you can use slideshow/code-pict instead?
Robby
On Sun, Sep 21, 2014 at 6:00 PM, Marc Burns wrote:
> The culprit is the slideshow/code module loaded into the sandbox
> evaluator. Requiring slideshow/code attempts to establish an X server
> connection.
>
> On Mon, Sep 22, 2014 at 12:12:37AM
The culprit is the slideshow/code module loaded into the sandbox
evaluator. Requiring slideshow/code attempts to establish an X server
connection.
On Mon, Sep 22, 2014 at 12:12:37AM +0300, J Arcane wrote:
> Greetings,
>
> For some time now, it's bothered me a bit that Racket doesn't have an
> onl
It seems like types defined with #:omit-define-syntaxes can be used within the same module, but not when it’s provided and required into a different module. Is this a bug, or is there something else I need to do, or what? #lang typed/racket(module thing typed/racket (provide x) (define-type x 5
Greetings,
For some time now, it's bothered me a bit that Racket doesn't have an
online REPL currently hosted anywhere. There's one written here:
https://github.com/voila/try-racket
But no one's hosted it anywhere. So I took it upon myself to fix that. I've
purchased try-racket.org and a basic Di
I think the way i have seen this done is to use a macro at the top level
instead of a provide transformer.
for example define/provide-test-suite from rackunit probably works a little like
(define/provide-test-suite tests blah blah …)
=>
(begin
(provide tests)
(define tests
10 matches
Mail list logo
