Hi,
I'm using the racket webserver and I want to put a varnish directly in
front of it.
With the default config of varnish (just changing the host/port for the
backend to match my racket application) I got an error :
FetchError c chunked tail no NL
I think this refers to the following code i
You may be interested in this project from the first RacketCon a few
years back: https://github.com/cky/rackona
On Mon, Mar 10, 2014 at 11:07 PM, Charlie Jacobsen
wrote:
> After more thought, I can see this will be a lot different from ffi to C.
> You would probably need to fire up a jvm to exec
Out of curiosity, why would removing the prompt tag change the behavior?
On Mon, Mar 10, 2014 at 10:50 PM, Matthew Flatt
wrote:
> I think this is a compiler bug, where the compiler is changing
>(let ([a (cons 1 2)])
> (call-with-composable-continuation (λ (k) (set! g k)) p)
> a)
>
After more thought, I can see this will be a lot different from ffi to C.
You would probably need to fire up a jvm to execute the code? Not really
sure.
Charlie
On Mon, Mar 10, 2014 at 7:58 PM, Charlie Jacobsen <
charlie.jacob...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Is this available? I found one or two sources
I think this is a compiler bug, where the compiler is changing
(let ([a (cons 1 2)])
(call-with-composable-continuation (λ (k) (set! g k)) p)
a)
to
(begin
(call-with-composable-continuation (λ (k) (set! g k)) p)
(cons 1 2))
so you get a new pair each time the continuat
On a lovely side note, asumu fixed this small case by changing (set! g k)
=> (set! g (lambda () a (k))).
However when I plugged that into the larger program I distilled this
example from, `eq?' still returns #f.
On Mon, Mar 10, 2014 at 10:07 PM, Matthias Felleisen
wrote:
>
> Baffled, too.
>
>
>
Baffled, too.
On Mar 10, 2014, at 9:44 PM, Spencer Florence wrote:
> For some reason the below program returns false:
>
> #lang racket
> (define g #f)
> (define p (make-continuation-prompt-tag))
> (define (t)
> (let ([a (cons 1 2)])
> (call-with-composable-continuation (λ (k) (set! g k)
Is this available? I found one or two sources through a casual google
search.
(I'm building a plt-redex model for a programming language, and I would
like to use the parser (which is written in java) to bring in the AST and
then compile it to an s-expr for plt-redex. Maybe this is a dumb idea sinc
For some reason the below program returns false:
#lang racket
(define g #f)
(define p (make-continuation-prompt-tag))
(define (t)
(let ([a (cons 1 2)])
(call-with-composable-continuation (λ (k) (set! g k)) p)
a))
(call-with-continuation-prompt t p)
(eq? (call-with-continuation-prompt g p
On Mon, Mar 10, 2014 at 7:34 PM, Matt Jadud wrote:
> Hi Matthew,
>
> (Or, anyone else who chimes in...)
>
> I have not noticed whether there are rendered versions of 3rd-party library
> documentation anywhere.
Currently, there's no centralized place where you can read
documentation for libraries
Hi Matthew,
(Or, anyone else who chimes in...)
I have not noticed whether there are rendered versions of 3rd-party library
documentation anywhere. Is the idea that I would:
1. git clone [lib]
2. open docs/...
on my local machine if I'm curious about the library? (Or, install via
IDE.) One of th
Hey Users,
I want to expand Racket Salon Boston from talks to talks and tutorial
sessions. I'm looking for someone to talk about a piece of Racket they
use and understand well, then help the attendees write a program using
that piece of Racket.
I thought of doing an IRC client, maybe some machine
Martin DeMello wrote at 03/10/2014 05:32 PM:
How about scribble -> pandoc? That would give you a whole lot of other
targets in one fell swoop.
For non-profit purposes, I'm giving first priority to EPUB, which is
pretty much the open standard. I'm happy to let Kindle-specific (KF8
and their o
How about scribble -> pandoc? That would give you a whole lot of other
targets in one fell swoop.
martin
On Sun, Mar 9, 2014 at 4:55 AM, Vincent St-Amour wrote:
> I looked into EPUB generation from Racket (with the eventual goal of
> making a Scribble back-end) some time last year. I didn't get
On Mon, Mar 10, 2014 at 11:41 AM, Danny Yoo wrote:
> As an aside: I do not understand the comment that VIM must be
> installed from sources, either. A Google search for the term "vim
> windows" comes with the first hit to the official VIM web site's link
> to a pre-packaged, self-installing exec
On Mon, 10 Mar 2014 15:09:28 -0400
Sean Kanaley wrote:
> The current Racket algorithm has an error:
>
> (define counts (build-vector 10 identity))
>
> This sets the counts to their indices, meaning e.g. 9 was pre-counted
> 9 times. Switch the first line of the executable portion to run only
>
The current Racket algorithm has an error:
(define counts (build-vector 10 identity))
This sets the counts to their indices, meaning e.g. 9 was pre-counted 9
times. Switch the first line of the executable portion to run only say 3
trials to see the effects. It should be:
(define counts (make-v
>
> racket/bin/racket: /lib64/libc.so.6: version `GLIBC_2.14' not found (required
> by racket/bin/racket)
Note: this error has been seen in other contexts. A Google search for
this term comes up with several hits:
https://www.google.com/#q=%2Flib64%2Flibc.so.6%3A+version+%60GLIBC_2.14'+n
18 matches
Mail list logo
