As long as people are discussing http client libraries, I've been wondering
what the status of net/cookie is. It seems that it's geared towards
server-side cookie management (and I don't see an obvious way to generate
Cookie: headers from net/cookie structs since none of the accessors are
exported)
Hi all,
I saw a post on SO asking how to use Typed Racket in #lang scribble/lp.
Is there a way to make this work?
http://stackoverflow.com/questions/18877881/how-to-use-typed-racket-in-scribble-lp
I tried a few things and I couldn't get it to work. (requiring TR
doesn't work).
Cheers,
Asumu
What if we suggest some games to implement? He'd be alone but surrounded by
Racketeers who know.
On Sep 23, 2013, at 8:15 PM, Geoffrey S. Knauth wrote:
> I'm bringing my 16 year-old son to RacketCon on Sunday, since he loves
> Racket. It's also the weekend of my college 30th reunion. On th
The hackathon is open for anyone to work on anything. We have suggestions,
which may or may not be at your son's speed, but we'll be there to help him
find something that's good for him, and the choice will ultimately be up to
him. So absolutely, send him along if he'd like to join us!
--Carl
O
I'm bringing my 16 year-old son to RacketCon on Sunday, since he loves Racket.
It's also the weekend of my college 30th reunion. On the Saturday, he could go
to the Racket hackathon, or he could go to my daytime reunion activities. I
was looking at the list of things going on at the hackathon
I wanted to show how to define auxiliary functions for syntax processing,
something you do wish to know when you come from Emacs/CL
On Sep 23, 2013, at 12:31 PM, Sam Tobin-Hochstadt wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 23, 2013 at 11:59 AM, Matthias Felleisen
> wrote:
>>
>> (define field-name (append-i
On Mon, Sep 23, 2013 at 11:59 AM, Matthias Felleisen
wrote:
>
> (define field-name (append-id stx "-" #'f))
> (define set-name (append-id stx #'f "-set!"))
It gets even shorter when you write this as:
(define field-name (format-id stx "-~a" #'f))
(define set-name (format-id stx "~a-s
Is the following code really that much more complicated that define-macro? --
Matthias
#lang racket
(require (for-syntax syntax/parse))
(define-syntax (new-field stx)
(syntax-parse stx
[(_ f:id) #'(new-field f null)]
[(_ f:id default-value)
(define field-name (append-id stx "
The latest weather forecast is basically sunny, high 70F, low 44F,
today through Sunday.
No guarantees. Boston is often one of those, "if you don't like the
weather, wait 15 minutes" places.
This time of year the weather _can_ actually be stable for a week. If
so, should be great for walking and
Dear all:
I've been developing a library that needs some macro coding. As I come
from Common-Lisp and Elisp, I find more pleasing the old-style
define-macro. The following function is used as a part of the result
building of another define-macro:
(define (new-field-mono f-name (default-va
10 matches
Mail list logo