Re: [racket] learn racket in 10 minutes

2013-07-18 Thread Greg Hendershott
On Thu, Jul 18, 2013 at 3:19 AM, Roger Rousseau wrote: > The site uses syntax highlighting from Rouge > (https://github.com/jayferd/rouge), via middleman-syntax, which > unfortunately doesn't have a Racket highlighting built in. It's been a > problem a few times; notably, F# is using C# highlighti

Re: [racket] Roadmap for Racket

2013-07-18 Thread Charles Hoffman
Scheme -> Racket -> Ruse -- [chuck hoffman] [sounds, words, and code] [what else is there?] [http://hoff2.com] On Jul 18, 2013, at 3:41 PM, Carl Eastlund wrote: > I dunno, it seems like a perfectly fine word, it's printed in grocery stores > all the time. Now, "woah", on the other hand, that's

Re: [racket] Roadmap for Racket

2013-07-18 Thread Robby Findler
Yeah, American history. Sigh. On Thu, Jul 18, 2013 at 3:40 PM, Laurent wrote: > Todd just taught me that... too bad! > > > > On Thu, Jul 18, 2013 at 10:31 PM, Robby Findler < > ro...@eecs.northwestern.edu> wrote: > >> Woah, that's a _not_ a good word! >> >> >> On Thu, Jul 18, 2013 at 11:28 AM,

Re: [racket] Roadmap for Racket

2013-07-18 Thread Carl Eastlund
I dunno, it seems like a perfectly fine word, it's printed in grocery stores all the time. Now, "woah", on the other hand, that's not a good word. :-P Carl "Whoa!" Eastlund On Thu, Jul 18, 2013 at 4:31 PM, Robby Findler wrote: > Woah, that's a _not_ a good word! > > > On Thu, Jul 18, 2013 at 1

Re: [racket] Roadmap for Racket

2013-07-18 Thread Laurent
Todd just taught me that... too bad! On Thu, Jul 18, 2013 at 10:31 PM, Robby Findler wrote: > Woah, that's a _not_ a good word! > > > On Thu, Jul 18, 2013 at 11:28 AM, Laurent wrote: > >> ``Cracker'', with a lot of cheese. >> (it even retains the "bad guy" style of Scheme and Racket) >> >> Lau

Re: [racket] Roadmap for Racket

2013-07-18 Thread Robby Findler
Woah, that's a _not_ a good word! On Thu, Jul 18, 2013 at 11:28 AM, Laurent wrote: > ``Cracker'', with a lot of cheese. > (it even retains the "bad guy" style of Scheme and Racket) > > Laurent > > > On Thu, Jul 18, 2013 at 5:40 PM, gonzalo diethelm wrote: > >> I like “rocket”, but in the sense

Re: [racket] learn racket in 10 minutes

2013-07-18 Thread Greg Hendershott
> I think λ needs to be added to the list of keywords Actually λ was in the list all along. Python requires the string literal to be u'λ' not 'λ'. #SpoiledByRacket I submitted a PR to Pygments with the fix. Racket Users list: http://lists.racket-lang.org/users

Re: [racket] Question about string conversion

2013-07-18 Thread m0nastic
Thanks. I really appreciate all the responses I've gotten about this, you folks are all Aces. I'll give net/head another look. It was actually the first thing I looked into, but seemed like it was mostly for dealing with email addresses (which counter-intuitively aren't the data fields in the hea

Re: [racket] Question about string conversion

2013-07-18 Thread Nick Shelley
I recently came across a site that made coming up with regular expressions much, much easier for me: http://www.debuggex.com/ Hopefully that will help with your "regex hell" problem. On Thursday, July 18, 2013, Greg Hendershott wrote: > To add to what Carl and Robby said: > > On Thu, Jul 18, 201

Re: [racket] Roadmap for Racket

2013-07-18 Thread Laurent
``Cracker'', with a lot of cheese. (it even retains the "bad guy" style of Scheme and Racket) Laurent On Thu, Jul 18, 2013 at 5:40 PM, gonzalo diethelm wrote: > I like “rocket”, but in the sense of the vegetable… > > ** ** > > rocket, roquette, rugula > > ** ** > > -- > > Gonzalo

Re: [racket] Roadmap for Racket

2013-07-18 Thread gonzalo diethelm
I like “rocket”, but in the sense of the vegetable… rocket, roquette, rugula -- Gonzalo Diethelm DCV Chile From: users-boun...@racket-lang.org [mailto:users-boun...@racket-lang.org] On Behalf Of Sean McBeth Sent: Wednesday, July 17, 2013 2:50 PM To: Sean Kanaley Cc: users@racket-lang.org; John

Re: [racket] Is there a contribution guide for Racket?

2013-07-18 Thread Vincent St-Amour
At Thu, 18 Jul 2013 10:38:24 -0400, Greg Hendershott wrote: > 3. There's a wiki page here: > > https://github.com/plt/racket/wiki > > It would probably be good if that had a link to Joe's post? Added. Vincent Racket Users list: http://lists.racket-lang.org/users

Re: [racket] Is there a contribution guide for Racket?

2013-07-18 Thread Greg Hendershott
1. This blog post by Joe Gibbs Politz helped me tremendously the first time: http://blog.racket-lang.org/2012/11/tutorial-contributing-to-racket.html Note: I think it _might_ need some small updates in light of the new reorganization of the source into packages. In some cases the instructions wil

[racket] Is there a contribution guide for Racket?

2013-07-18 Thread Ben Duan
Dear All, Is there a contribution guide for Racket, especially for junior developers? Most of you are highly sophisticated programmers working on hard problems. You know how to contribute to open source projects. But racket sometimes is also used as a teaching tool. Some of the users are newcomer

Re: [racket] Question about string conversion

2013-07-18 Thread Greg Hendershott
To add to what Carl and Robby said: On Thu, Jul 18, 2013 at 2:29 AM, wrote: > (although truth be told, mail headers are surprisingly nonstandard even > within a single message) That's where net/head could definitely help. (Especially for SMTP headers, which tend to be more "interesting" than ty

[racket] Call for Papers IFL 2013

2013-07-18 Thread Jurriaan Hage
Hello, Please, find below the third call for papers for IFL 2013. Please forward these to anyone you think may be interested. Apologies for any duplicates you may receive. best regards, Jurriaan Hage Publicity Chair of IFL CALL FOR PAPERS 25th SYMPOSIUM ON IMPLEMENTATION AND APPLICATION OF FUN

Re: [racket] Question about string conversion

2013-07-18 Thread Robby Findler
Also, check out the net/head library: http://docs.racket-lang.org/net/head.html?q=header%20parse&q=header Robby On Thu, Jul 18, 2013 at 2:25 AM, Carl Eastlund wrote: > Chris, > > The regexp-match* function has a rather complex input/output > specification, because it is doing a lot of things

[racket] raco distribute error

2013-07-18 Thread Cosme Enmanuel Zamudio Salazar
i get the following error when i try to raco distribute D:\source\opsdownloader>raco exe --gui --ico opsdownloader.ico opsdownloader.rkt D:\source\opsdownloader>raco distribute opsdownloader opsdownloader.exe copy-and-patch-binaries: not enough room in executable for revised #rx#"rUnTiMe- paths[)]

Re: [racket] Question about string conversion

2013-07-18 Thread Carl Eastlund
Chris, The regexp-match* function has a rather complex input/output specification, because it is doing a lot of things at once. If you only want the first match of a regular expression, you might want to consider regexp-match instead (no *); its specification is slightly simpler, though still a l