Thanks everybody for the suggestions
I've followed most of them, except adding a section about "Units" because I
felt there was already a lot to take in
Amended version is here:
https://github.com/voila/learnxinyminutes-docs/blob/master/racket.html.markdown
I plan to send a pull request tonight.
I had tried only from `racket', but I see the same result as you in
DrRacket or with `errortrace'.
I'll have to investigate further.
At Sun, 14 Jul 2013 17:06:04 -0600, Christopher wrote:
> The code you gave doesn't seem to work either. After saving your code in a
> file named test-n.rkt, and r
The code you gave doesn't seem to work either. After saving your code in a
file named test-n.rkt, and running it, I get the following error:
Welcome to DrRacket, version 5.3.4 [3m].
Language: racket; memory limit: 256 MB.
. . ../../../../Applications/Racket
v5.3.4/collects/errortrace/errortrace
I see that the `pressedMouseButtons' method of `NSEvent' was not
available until OS X 10.6, so the implementation of
`get-current-mouse-state' needs to avoid it in 10.5 and earlier.
At Sun, 14 Jul 2013 18:29:27 +0100, Erich Rast wrote:
> This bug is a minor show-stopper in my project ("minor" beca
At Sun, 14 Jul 2013 12:50:32 -0600, Christopher wrote:
> #lang racket
>
> (module A racket
> (provide x)
> (define x #t) )
>
> (let []
> (local-require 'A)
> x )
The '-based shorthand for submodules only works in certain situations.
(Generalizing that has been on my to-do list for a lon
Yes, these are both doable. For side-effects, probably the easiest thing is
to have an expression paired with a store in your reduction relation. For
threads you can use the pattern matcher's support for ambiguity to model
non-deterministic choice.
There are examples of both of these in the redex
#lang racket
(module A racket
(provide x)
(define x #t) )
(let []
(local-require 'A)
x )
FAILS WITH:
Welcome to DrRacket, version 5.3.4 [3m].
Language: racket; memory limit: 256 MB.
. . ../../Applications/Racket
v5.3.4/collects/racket/private/reqprov.rkt:1092:2: require: unknown mod
I just tried but do not get a crash with OS X 10.7.5 and DrRacket 5.3.5.
On Sun, Jul 14, 2013 at 1:29 PM, Erich Rast wrote:
> This bug is a minor show-stopper in my project ("minor" because I could
> simply remove the functionality that makes use of the function).
> The bug was filed on May 26 an
Hi,
I am not sure whether it is the right place to ask the questions, but I
didn't find the PLT-Redex mailing list or something like that:
My questions are (quoted from stack overflow:
http://stackoverflow.com/questions/17642316/can-plt-redex-model-these-features
)
Just starting to learn PLT-Re
How about throwing in a simple macro?
Robby
On Sunday, July 14, 2013, Richard Lawrence wrote:
> Hi Roger,
>
> This is cool, thanks for putting it together!
>
> Roger Rousseau >
> writes:
>
> > It's largely inspired from the Clojure version and the Racket
> documentation
> > I would be grateful f
This bug is a minor show-stopper in my project ("minor" because I could
simply remove the functionality that makes use of the function).
The bug was filed on May 26 and nobody is assigned to it yet, so
I wonder: Is it repeatable? Could someone else confirm it? Does it only
occur in my particular VM
Hi Roger,
This is cool, thanks for putting it together!
Roger Rousseau
writes:
> It's largely inspired from the Clojure version and the Racket documentation
> I would be grateful for any corrections/suggestions before I send a pull
> request to get this online
Here are a couple of (tiny) sugge
On Sun, Jul 14, 2013 at 7:08 AM, Roger Rousseau wrote:
> It's largely inspired from the Clojure version and the Racket documentation
> I would be grateful for any corrections/suggestions before I send a pull
> request to get this online
That is really, really nice.
A few of my personal favorites
On 06/27/2013 02:15 PM, John Clements wrote:
On Jun 12, 2013, at 9:24 AM, Tom Schouten wrote:
On 05/30/2013 08:21 PM, Tom Schouten wrote:
On 05/30/2013 05:30 PM, John Clements wrote:
On May 30, 2013, at 1:21 PM, Tom Schouten wrote:
Hi List,
Here's a tiny experimental tool I've been working
Great! Two suggestions -- I'd move `set!` later, and maybe have a
section for mutation, with vectors as well. Also, I think some
version of `for/list` and `for/hash` would be good to show off in the
loop section.
Sam
On Sun, Jul 14, 2013 at 8:08 AM, Roger Rousseau wrote:
> Hello
>
> Following
Hello
Following Sam's suggestion on Twitter
I have done a Racket version of http://learnxinyminutes.com/
which can be found here:
https://github.com/voila/learnxinyminutes-docs/blob/master/racket.html.markdown
It's largely inspired from the Clojure version and the Racket documentation
I would be
16 matches
Mail list logo
