Do you have the ability to run DrRacket from the command line? If so, it
may be a useful clue if you were to type control-c at the prompt after it
gets good and hung. There is some chance that that will print out some
context information about an infinite loop that DrRacket has fallen into
and that
On 06/25/13 21:14, Matthew Flatt wrote:
So "search-context.html" has a newer timestamp than "make-search.rkt"?
Yes.
That would explain the problem, leaving the question of how the
timestamp on "search-context.html" changed.
I don't know if this is related to the bug:
raco setup: rendering:
Or maybe the expansion could be tweaked? (and a test case added?)
Robby
On Tue, Jun 25, 2013 at 10:50 AM, Sam Tobin-Hochstadt wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 24, 2013 at 8:21 AM, Matthias Felleisen
> wrote:
> >
> > On Jun 23, 2013, at 8:34 PM, Sam Tobin-Hochstadt wrote:
> >
> >>>
> >>> After porting near
So "search-context.html" has a newer timestamp than "make-search.rkt"?
That would explain the problem, leaving the question of how the
timestamp on "search-context.html" changed.
Meanwhile, I believe the deeper problem here --- that `rack pkg install
-u' should never try to rebuild installation f
raco setup: version: 5.3.5 [3m]
raco setup: variants: 3m
raco setup: main collects: /usr/local/lib/racket/collects
raco setup: collects paths:
raco setup: /home/juanfra/.racket/5.3.5/collects
raco setup: /usr/local/lib/racket/collects
raco setup: --- pre-installing collections ---
raco setup:
No, never seems to come back, but I will wait longer next time.
No, no typing and the file works as it is about 75% of the time.
BTW, this happened on 5.3.4 and 5.3.3, but less often
-joe
On Mon, Jun 24, 2013 at 5:32 PM, Robby Findler
wrote:
> Does it eventually come back?
>
> You don't, by a
If the purpose is to work thru a 'regular starter book', Realm of Racket may
work better than 2e at the moment if someone can help. ROAR basically assumes
someone has programmed a little bit in something, anything.
If the purpose is to launch the person on a career in programming, start with
To the authors:
I have recommended Realm of Racket to a friend who expressed an interest
in programming in conjunction with HtDP. Now, I'm sure the creators
would "strongly encourage" future software engineers to be comfortable
with the material in HtDP, but exactly how difficult is the "inte
Thank you. Reading the match docs, I didn't infer the significance of
quasipatterns for XML parsing.
On Tue, Jun 25, 2013 at 6:14 AM, Matthias Felleisen wrote:
>
> On Jun 24, 2013, at 9:52 PM, Matthew Butterick wrote:
>
> > I've seen this technique recommended numerous times. Would anyone have a
On Mon, Jun 24, 2013 at 8:21 AM, Matthias Felleisen
wrote:
>
> On Jun 23, 2013, at 8:34 PM, Sam Tobin-Hochstadt wrote:
>
>>>
>>> After porting nearly everything I was left with typing up the command-line
>>> parser. However, I am getting a type error at the following simplified part:
>>
>> Here's
Thank you both Matthias and Roman for explaining those things so thoroughly :)
Matthias Felleisen writes:
> Second, here is why your code is potentially buggy. Suppose you used the
type of your mystringlistlist as an
> argument type to f. You could then apply f to '( () ), which is a list of
li
Philipp Dikmann writes:
> Re-loading a changed file is intended behavior for the enter! command:
> http://docs.racket-lang.org/reference/enter.html
That's desirable and appreciated.
What I'm seeing is that the submodule is being evaluated, which does not
occur when one first enter the file or r
... yet I failed to notice the subtleties of your original question (why
it enters the submodule twice).
No idea about that - sorry for being over-ambitious!
On 25.06.13 15:19, Philipp Dikmann wrote:
Re-loading a changed file is intended behavior for the enter! command:
http://docs.racket-lang.
Re-loading a changed file is intended behavior for the enter! command:
http://docs.racket-lang.org/reference/enter.html
On 25.06.13 11:48, Diogo F. S. Ramos wrote:
When entering a file from a submodule inside this file, the submodule
seems to be evaluated again. Is this the intended behavior?
On Jun 24, 2013, at 9:52 PM, Matthew Butterick wrote:
> I've seen this technique recommended numerous times. Would anyone have a link
> to an idiomatic example of the technique in use? Thank you.
>
> Racket Users list:
> http://lists.racket-lang.org/users
Your question i
When entering a file from a submodule inside this file, the submodule
seems to be evaluated again. Is this the intended behavior?
Here are the steps to reproduce it:
1. Create a file with a submodule inside it
2. Enter file
3. Enter submodule
4. Change the file and save it
5. Enter the file
Here
I guess it's more than an immediate timestamp on that file, then.
Can you try
raco setup -j 1 -v -m -D scribblings/main
? It should produce a lot of output, including the reason that
"make-search.rkt" is being recompiled.
Thanks!
At Mon, 24 Jun 2013 21:10:03 +0200, Juan Francisco Cantero Hur
17 matches
Mail list logo
