On Fri, Jun 7, 2013 at 1:50 AM, Matthew Flatt wrote:
> FWIW, there's also `(current-text-keymap-initializer)'.
>
http://docs.racket-lang.org/gui/Editor_Functions.html#%28def._%28%28lib._mred/main..rkt%29._current-text-keymap-initializer%29%29
Here is an example of how to use it:
https://gist.gi
Great timing! It's been on my short list to make my static blog
generator more flexible. From
http://docs.racket-lang.org/web-server/templates.html I got the idea
that it would be suitable only for static templates, but now I
understand that's not the case. Today I made a topic branch using this
ap
FWIW, there's also `(current-text-keymap-initializer)'.
At Thu, 6 Jun 2013 09:13:09 +0200, Laurent wrote:
> As I understand it, `add-text-keymap-funcions' makes these functions
> mappable, but does not give you the default mappings.
>
> You can either add the keybindings yourself, or you can use
At Mon, 3 Jun 2013 13:57:53 -0400, Greg Hendershott wrote:
> Let's say I have a command-line utility distributed as a package.
>
> package/
> info.rkt
> collection/
> main.rkt
>
> package/info.rkt is e.g.
>
> #lang setup/infotab
> (define version "1.1")
>
> In main.rkt, I want t
Fixed - thanks!
At Thu, 06 Jun 2013 07:23:19 +0400, Клочков Роман wrote:
>
> http://docs.racket-lang.org/foreign/foreign_procedures.html#%28part._foreign~3ac
> ustom-types%29
>
> ( define-fun-syntax _float*
> ( syntax-id-rules ( _float* )
> [ ( _float* ) ( type: _float pre:
Hello all,
I was curious why Scheme and now Racket does not inherently support a
generic set!. I found an SRFI
http://srfi.schemers.org/srfi-17/srfi-17.htmlthat suggests a generic
method solution requiring a lookup for the "real"
setter (and so needing a special setter for every data type. What
Hi Eli,
The short answer is that I now love using symbols for keys!
In the back of my mind are still some reservations, but in day to day
coding, it is very pleasurable. E.g. since I often need to extract a
value from within a json or other dictionary-like structure (e.g. http
header, or sexpr co
It bugs me too, at times. But it does solve some problems. My cell
hates big giant web pages that take three minutes to load when all I'm
looking for is a phone number or "why is my Comcast down?". (The
answer is you have to wade through big giant web pages in order to
sign up for text alerts.) My
I have nothing against Scribble. For me it is practical -- I have tons
of mustache templates created for another web server, so I want to
(mostly) just drop in a Racket web app to take over. Also, I need to
support client side templates. Mustache (or as I like to remind myself
c-templates) so some
On Thu, Jun 6, 2013 at 11:01 AM, Jay McCarthy wrote:
> I'm curious why you think Mustache is better than Scribble (and the
> full power of Racket) in your templates?
In this case, I'm willing to give Mustache a chance for a few reasons:
1. Some bias from a web programmer who finds Mustache-like
My cellphone and I, we hates the client-side HTML rendering, gollumgollum.
On Thu, Jun 6, 2013 at 11:01 AM, Jay McCarthy wrote:
> I'm curious why you think Mustache is better than Scribble (and the
> full power of Racket) in your templates?
>
> On Thu, Jun 6, 2013 at 8:53 AM, Joe Gibbs Politz w
I'm curious why you think Mustache is better than Scribble (and the
full power of Racket) in your templates?
On Thu, Jun 6, 2013 at 8:53 AM, Joe Gibbs Politz wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 5, 2013 at 9:37 PM, Erik Pearson wrote:
>> @joe I have a relatively simple implementation of "mustache" templates
>>
[Late reply, since the other thread reminded me of this. Might be
irrelevant for your actual decisions by now...]
On April 22nd, Erik Pearson wrote:
> Hi Eli,
>
> Wow, thanks for the great feedback.
>
> On Mon, Apr 22, 2013 at 3:21 PM, Eli Barzilay wrote:
> > General comment: unless you have
On Wed, Jun 5, 2013 at 9:37 PM, Erik Pearson wrote:
> @joe I have a relatively simple implementation of "mustache" templates
> that I use for web server templating.
>
> Something similar to your example would be
>
> (render "Welcome {{username}}" #hasheq((username . "erik")))
>
> where the data is
Folks,
FYI - I've just regenerated: http://www.timb.net/popular-languages.html
#CountName 1744Tcl 2676Python 3667Racket
then lesser languages like C (#4 - 663), Java (#17 - 505) and ZX Spectrum
Basic (#93 - 78)
That's nine short of the Silver spot!
Well done folks!
In a flurry of self promotio
Hi Laurent,
Many thanks!
The thing worth noting from a document management/improvement perspective:
I have never seen the framework collection.
(Both are possible), but either:
1. I really missed something obvious somewhere, or
2. No search of mine in the docs ever turned up this very useful c
Hi Ray,
On 2013-05-30 12:53 PM, Ray Racine wrote:
> Very happy to see this.
:-)
> What is the general assumption, if any, regarding message delivery
> guarantees? Guaranteed, Once-And-Only-Once, At-Most-Once. And Message
> Ordering. Say between 2 physical node Ground-VMs across a network?
> N
As I understand it, `add-text-keymap-funcions' makes these functions
mappable, but does not give you the default mappings.
You can either add the keybindings yourself, or you can use the framework's
procedure `keymap:get-editor' which gives you default bindings.
Here is a working example:
https:/
18 matches
Mail list logo
