I'm using racket from the linux shell, and not drracket.
I'd like to import and use the racket-bert package. However I think the
r6rs support that it requires is somehow preventing me from importing it or
using it at the racket prompt. Can r6rs packages be called interactively
from the racket (n
See
http://www.ccs.neu.edu/racket/pubs/#popl12-kfff [*]
http://www.ccs.neu.edu/racket/pubs/#oopsla12-stf
http://www.ccs.neu.edu/racket/pubs/#oopsla12-sthff [*]
The {*]s include Redex material, especially popl 12.
If you need source, send email to the lead and/or senior author.
I am sure w
Don, we have no absolute commitment to backward compatibility but we rarely
break it and, when we do, we try to support the transition. [We use every
feature in our language so we need those transition tools and are happy to
support others.]
See Neil's response. He's a power user -- Matthias
I'm trying to wrap my head around them and be able to use them.
I'm trying to write something for a Clojure compability layer in Github and i
just find it impossible to use the make-readtable procedure to start doing
something.
Can someone show me the code to make this #"hello" expand to (regex
Thank you for the explanation. As a new Racket user, in general I find the
docs thorough and well done. (I have HTDP and SICP nearby as well.) Coming
to Racket from Python, the differences in the module system have been
slowest to take hold (exacerbated by the fact that one cannot temporarily
kludg
Don Green wrote at 04/28/2013 08:33 PM:
Is there any assurance3 that a program written with Racket wil work
with a future version of Racket?
There have been a few non-backward-compatible changes over the last
decade. Since you're using 5.2.1, which is fairly recent, I don't think
you have to
Is there any assurance3 that a program written with Racket wil work with a
future version of Racket? I expect the short answer is: No.
Any related comments are appreciated.
I am using Racket version 5.2.1.
I have found that regexp functions are too slow for large data files but
maybe newer version
What are the requirements & constraints for a function to be accepted for
inclusion in Racket?
Thanks
Don Green
Racket Users list:
http://lists.racket-lang.org/users
On Apr 28, 2013, at 2:46 AM, Jordan Johnson wrote:
> 1) Write a couple of test cases for insert-everywhere/in-one-word. Specific
> data is almost always easier to think about than abstract names. At very
> least, make a test case for a 1-letter word w1 and another for a 2-letter
> word w2,
At Sun, 28 Apr 2013 08:28:46 -0700, Matthew Butterick wrote:
> >
> > The syntax of `enter!' is supposed to be like `require', where the
> > module name is not quoted
>
>
> OK, I see what you're saying. And yes, the enter! / require connection is
> noted in the docs.
>
> As a reader of docs, what
Hello,
Apart from http://www.cs.utah.edu/plt/publications/icfp09-fbf.pdf
are there other (conference or journal) papers written using Scribble,
with the .scrbl source available?
I am particularly interested in examples which also use Redex.
Thanks. Cheers,
~n
Racket Users
Your base case must be a list (Contracts and tests are optional):
#lang racket
;; -
;; a simple fizzbuzz function
(provide
(contract-out
;; given a natural number, produce the fizz/buzz list for it
(fizzbuzz (->
I'm trying to teach myself scheme (racket) and decided to try writing
fizzbuzz. My program mostly works, but instead of getting a single list, I
get a list with a dot before the last list item, which I assume means I've
got a 'cons' at the end rather than just one list. What am I doing wrong?
Any
require is a syntactic form with restricted syntax to allow determining
dependencies without evaluation. Your example with define breaks this
restriction.
-Ian
- Original Message -
From: Matthew Butterick
To: Matthew Flatt
Cc: Racket mailing list
Sent: Sun, 28 Apr 2013 11:28:46 -0400 (
>
> The syntax of `enter!' is supposed to be like `require', where the
> module name is not quoted
OK, I see what you're saying. And yes, the enter! / require connection is
noted in the docs.
As a reader of docs, what trips me up here is that the docs for enter! and
require both refer to a modul
The syntax of `enter!' is supposed to be like `require', where the
module name is not quoted. If you remove the quote, then something like
(enter! file/gif)
doesn't work.
It would make sense to move the transitive module-reloading part of
`enter!' to a a new module and provide a `dynamic-re-re
Thanks, I'll try that. However, I still think there might be a bug in
racket/enter.rkt. Currently lines 10-11 look like this:
[(enter! mod flag ...) (andmap keyword? (syntax->datum #'(flag ...)))
#'(do-enter! 'mod '(flag ...))]
But when I remove the quoting from mod in line 11, like so
17 matches
Mail list logo
