Three hours ago, Patrick King wrote:
>
> I'm not particularly surprised, other than what appeared to be
> "Private" in Windows really IS "Private" in Linux. It really was a
> simple cut & paste of the whole directory tree, and the use of case
> higher up the tree doesn't seem to cause any probl
On Thu, Apr 18, 2013 at 9:23 PM, Sean McBeth wrote:
> Windows filesystem is not case sensitive. Well, it can be in some weird
> cases, but legacy wise it is not.
>
It is very good at looking like it's case sensitive, layering the
descriptive filenames over the case-insensitive names "under the ho
Windows filesystem is not case sensitive. Well, it can be in some weird
cases, but legacy wise it is not. Unix file systems absolutely are case
sensitive. Your error is not surprising at all.
On Apr 18, 2013 9:15 PM, "Patrick King" wrote:
> I have broken free of Bill Gates' shackles, as I have th
I have broken free of Bill Gates' shackles, as I have threatened to do for
so long, installing Ubuntu alongside Windows
with fairly minimal drama.
However, when I copied and pasted my existing source code tree over to the
Linux side, code like this...
#lang racket/base
; Source/Project/Private/fi
Eduardo Costa wrote at 04/18/2013 07:29 PM:
I intend to use Racket for CGI. I can use the basic language without
problem. For instance, the below program works perfectly well.
#! ./racket/bin/racket
I'm not sure that this is the cause of the problem you are seeing, but
you probably want to
I intend to use Racket for CGI. I can use the basic language without
problem. For instance, the below program works perfectly well.
#! ./racket/bin/racket
#lang racket
;(require plot)
(display "Content-Type: text/plain")
(newline) (newline)
(display "Hello from Racket!")
(newline)
However, when
Hi everyone,
My hosting provider has been telling me that my compiler server for
Whalesong has been using about 1.4GB memory, but I'm _really_ confused
because I've got the whole thing under a racket/sandbox constrained at
256MB. Perhaps I'm doing something wrong?
Here's what the sysadmins are
At Thu, 18 Apr 2013 14:58:31 -0400, JP Verkamp wrote:
> Is there documentation / a list of steps that one can follow to set up a
> cross compiling build process for Racket where one can build (on one
> system) stand along executables? [...]
>
> If such a thing doesn't exist right now, is it possibl
Is there documentation / a list of steps that one can follow to set up a
cross compiling build process for Racket where one can build (on one
system) stand along executables? For that matter, is it even possible?
The only thing I've found thus far is the README on the Racket GitHub
repository whic
The Scheme Language Steering Committee (SLSC) has announced a
vote on whether the ninth draft R7RS produced by Working Group 1
should be endorsed by the SLSC.
Votes are due by the end of Sunday, May 13, 2013. For full
instructions on how to vote, with explanation of what the vote
is about, please
At Thu, 18 Apr 2013 14:51:55 +0100, Tim Brown wrote:
> The script (as it is) has STRIP_DEBUG="${CROSS_COMPILE}strip -S" on the
> "make install" command line. I also run configure with:
>
> ./configure --disable-docs --host=$HOST \
>STRIP_DEBUG="${CROSS_COMPILE}strip -S"
>
> But that ${CROSS_C
On Apr 18, 2013, at 8:18 AM, Stephen De Gabrielle wrote:
> FWIW this has a good (but brief) summary of the racket enhancements.
>
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Macro_(computer_science)#Hygienic_macros
Actually… I think you're referring to the text that I just inserted :). My bad
for saying "t
On 04/18/2013 11:35 AM, Diogo F. S. Ramos wrote:
Looking at `collects/net/sendurl.rkt' I see that `xdg-open' is commented
out in the `all-unix-browsers' list, although it's still a key in a case
in `send-url/unix'.
Is there a reason to not use `xdg-open'?
It doesn't work with file: URLs that h
Looking at `collects/net/sendurl.rkt' I see that `xdg-open' is commented
out in the `all-unix-browsers' list, although it's still a key in a case
in `send-url/unix'.
Is there a reason to not use `xdg-open'?
Racket Users list:
http://lists.racket-lang.org/users
FWIW this has a good (but brief) summary of the racket enhancements.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Macro_(computer_science)#Hygienic_macros
The hygienic macros page has a big section devoted to strategies in
languages that lack a hygienic macro system.
S.
On Wednesday, 17 April 2013, John Clements
At Thu, 18 Apr 2013 14:51:55 +0100, Tim Brown wrote:
> The script (as it is) has STRIP_DEBUG="${CROSS_COMPILE}strip -S" on the
> "make install" command line. I also run configure with:
>
> ./configure --disable-docs --host=$HOST \
>STRIP_DEBUG="${CROSS_COMPILE}strip -S"
>
> But that ${CROSS_C
My bad then, I didn't notice the "-" to "/" change.
Indeed that works.
Thanks,
Laurent
On Thu, Apr 18, 2013 at 3:51 PM, Jay McCarthy wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 16, 2013 at 6:50 AM, Laurent wrote:
> > Then, I could not manage to require the package with any of the following
> > lines:
> > (require sl
On Thu, Apr 18, 2013 at 9:51 AM, Tim Brown wrote:
>>
>> We're currently working on a new package system that will let us better
>> organize the core and make more useful layers --- but that's very much
>> a work in progress.
>
>
> Can I put in a vote for an "academic" layer and an "enterprise" lay
On 17/04/13 22:49, Matthew Flatt wrote:
At Tue, 16 Apr 2013 13:06:51 +0100, Tim Brown wrote:
Does `strip -S' reduce the size of `racket'? I don't have a PPC machine
handy, but I get a 7686107-byte executable for ARM, which turns into
2845517 bytes after `strip -S'.
Smashing! 2,774,370 bytes!
On Tue, Apr 16, 2013 at 6:50 AM, Laurent wrote:
> Then, I could not manage to require the package with any of the following
> lines:
> (require slideshow-latex)
> or
> (require slideshow-latex/slideshow)
> or
> (require slideshow-latex/slideshow/latex)
>
> What's the correct way of writing it?
Th
I just updated the package to specify this, btw.
Jay
On Tue, Apr 16, 2013 at 10:11 AM, Matthew Flatt wrote:
> I think the `slideshow-latex' package should probably have an
> "info.rkt" that contains
>
> (define setup-collects '("slideshow/latex"))
>
> so that only the "slideshow/latex" collect
Didn't try, but if I disable syntax check, the tooltips don't show, so I
guess it's the same.
I correct my previous answer: disabling syntax-check helps a little, but
the mouse pointer must not move during the whole click (which is quite
difficult on my touchpad).
The menu stays longer, but still r
This disables check syntax tooltips. Does that help?
--- a/collects/drracket/private/syncheck/gui.rkt
+++ b/collects/drracket/private/syncheck/gui.rkt
@@ -805,7 +805,7 @@ If the namespace does not, they are colored the unbound
color.
;; syncheck:add-mouse-over-status : text pos-left
As an aside, I changed from GNOME to KDE as my Desktop Environment --
I seem to have "better luck"* with the right menus on the latter. Don't
know if handles menu/transient windows differently.
* where luck is measure of apparent stability of the right menus. Although
it doesn't seem to work an
Yes, apparently.
In DrRacket, deactivating syntax check does not change the problem.
On Thu, Apr 18, 2013 at 1:52 PM, Robby Findler
wrote:
> If you run "gracket" does the right click menu work better there?
>
> Robby
>
>
> On Thu, Apr 18, 2013 at 6:45 AM, Laurent wrote:
>
>> Are there any news
If you run "gracket" does the right click menu work better there?
Robby
On Thu, Apr 18, 2013 at 6:45 AM, Laurent wrote:
> Are there any news about that bug? I miss the right-click menu very much...
>
> Laurent
>
>
> On Wed, Dec 5, 2012 at 5:30 AM, Neil Toronto wrote:
>
>> Could what you're exp
sorry but i dont know from where to start only.
On Thu, Apr 18, 2013 at 3:04 PM, Erich Rast wrote:
> My P2PTools package on Planet has methods for sending and receiving
> files over TCP.
>
> Best,
>
> Erich
>
> On Thu, 18 Apr 2013 13:32:38 +0530
> deepak verma wrote:
>
> > how can we send
Are there any news about that bug? I miss the right-click menu very much...
Laurent
On Wed, Dec 5, 2012 at 5:30 AM, Neil Toronto wrote:
> Could what you're experiencing have anything to do with tooltips? It seems
> my right-click menu doesn't stay up whenever there's a tooltip out. Which
> is,
My P2PTools package on Planet has methods for sending and receiving
files over TCP.
Best,
Erich
On Thu, 18 Apr 2013 13:32:38 +0530
deepak verma wrote:
> how can we send any kind of file using tcp..
> can someone illustrate using a simple code.
Racket Users list:
http:
On Thursday, April 18, 2013, deepak verma wrote:
> how can we send any kind of file using tcp..
> can someone illustrate using a simple code.
>
What difficulty are you having? From the questions you've asked so far,
I'm getting no sense of where you're getting stuck. Can you say more?
What ha
how can we send any kind of file using tcp..
can someone illustrate using a simple code.
Racket Users list:
http://lists.racket-lang.org/users
31 matches
Mail list logo
