Thanks, that's perfect! I knew it couldn't have been overlooked :)
On Sun, Apr 7, 2013 at 5:31 PM, J. Ian Johnson wrote:
> The ~in-between pattern and its specializations ~once and ~optional are
> great for this purpose. Anything matching this pattern must appear in the
> range given in ~in-be
You want ~once. See
http://docs.racket-lang.org/syntax/stxparse-patterns.html?q=syntax-parse#%28form._%28%28lib._syntax%2Fparse..rkt%29._~7eonce%29%29
and
http://docs.racket-lang.org/syntax/More_Keyword_Arguments.html?q=syntax-parse.
On Sun, Apr 7, 2013 at 5:23 PM, Scott Klarenbach wrote:
> Hi t
The ~in-between pattern and its specializations ~once and ~optional are great
for this purpose. Anything matching this pattern must appear in the range given
in ~in-between, even in ellipsis'd contexts.
(a:id b:id (~or (~once (~seq #:key1 c:id)) (~once (~seq #:key2 d:id))) ...)
-Ian
- Origi
Hi there,
I'd like to create a macro that accepts non-optional keyword arguments in
any order. It should however, ensure that all the arguments are provided.
Finally, it should not allow duplicates.
So far I've only been able to solve for my first criteria.
As a test, I have this:
(syntax-par
This is already fixed at HEAD,
https://github.com/plt/racket/commit/1334e8dcc77854ac826306d3f6a36150cb0bf0c1
has the fix.
On Sun, Apr 7, 2013 at 7:47 AM, Sam Tobin-Hochstadt wrote:
> On Sun, Apr 7, 2013 at 10:18 AM, Andrey Larionov wrote:
>> Hello, Racket community.
>> I'm a newbie and just star
I have already done that in the example, the issue is testing the
syntax it produces when called at phase 0.
On Sun, Apr 7, 2013 at 5:04 AM, Robby Findler
wrote:
> You can put your helper code in a submodule that you require from the test
> module at phase 0 but from the actual module at phase 1.
On Sun, Apr 7, 2013 at 10:18 AM, Andrey Larionov wrote:
> Hello, Racket community.
> I'm a newbie and just started study Racket and Typed Racket and a little
> confused with generalization and inference.
> I found what inference works different for different containers type. For
> example:
> Set:
Hello,
Is there a way to get the full path displayed when an anonymous
procedure object is pretty-printed?
By default it seems to add ellipsis in front like this:
#
Cheers,
Tom
Racket Users list:
http://lists.racket-lang.org/users
> "Typed Racket" is not valid because it contains a space.
Let me rephrase the question.
A package has a two names. One is used informally among people to refer to
a package. This could be Typed-Racket. The other is the name used in the
package system this could be typed-racket.
Is it clear from
Hello, Racket community.
I'm a newbie and just started study Racket and Typed Racket and a little
confused with generalization and inference.
I found what inference works different for different containers type. For
example:
Set:
> (set 0 195 196)
- : (Setof Byte)
(set 0 195 196)
List:
> '((195 . 1
On Sun, Apr 7, 2013 at 7:51 AM, Jens Axel Søgaard wrote:
> Let's say I want to submit Typed Racket as a package.
> Is the package name "Typed Racket" or typed-racket ?
"Typed Racket" is not valid because it contains a space.
> I just got a 503 from pkg.racket-lang.org, so I check whether
> it is
Let's say I want to submit Typed Racket as a package.
Is the package name "Typed Racket" or typed-racket ?
I just got a 503 from pkg.racket-lang.org, so I check whether
it is clear from the context what is meant.
/Jens Axel
2013/4/6 Robby Findler
> I just tried clicking thru this too and I
On 2013-04-06 4:54 PM, Jay McCarthy wrote:
> If you'd like, I can make the patch myself, but I think it may be more
> productive to figure out the deeper reason why it is hard to tell that
> "Contribute a Package" goes to a package information form and fix
> that, rather than just changing a text s
You can put your helper code in a submodule that you require from the test
module at phase 0 but from the actual module at phase 1.
Robby
On Sun, Apr 7, 2013 at 1:47 AM, Eric Dobson wrote:
> The issue with that is that it runs the code (compute) at phase1, when
> I need to run that code at pha
14 matches
Mail list logo
