Okay, I've made a first attempt at this (just now pushed to git). I added
the ability to add new mixins (via the drracket:get/extend:extend-*
functions) at any time (as long as you call a function to explicitly enable
that feature). DrRacket makes no attempt to adjust any existing objects
that have
Carl and Jay, thank you for your advice. I hesitated presenting it as
a "collection" because it's not example Racket source, it's more like
example input data, but I think you're right it's preferable to
install it. Thanks!
On Fri, Apr 5, 2013 at 3:47 PM, Jay McCarthy wrote:
> I agree with Carl.
On Thu, Apr 4, 2013 at 6:32 PM, Lindsey Kuper wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 4, 2013 at 11:15 AM, Matthias Felleisen
> wrote:
>> So, I think that you could use _Racket_'s syntax system to compute
>> the grammar. This is quite different from extending a base grammar
>> with new features or value clauses but
I agree with Carl. I think it is very useful for documentation to link
to full examples.
Jay
On Fri, Apr 5, 2013 at 1:10 PM, Carl Eastlund wrote:
> Greg,
>
> I'd suggest putting it in a subcollection named examples, so it at least
> gets installed _somewhere_. Users can always write (require
>
Greg,
I'd suggest putting it in a subcollection named examples, so it at least
gets installed _somewhere_. Users can always write (require
/examples/) and use the online syntax checker to jump
to the file, if it's otherwise hard to find. If compiling the examples is
burdensome, you can add them
On reflection, 3 seems impossible, since the content of the package is
whatever is in the Git repo. In other words, the .pkgignore that I
want _is_ .gitignore.
Anyway, if anyone has any suggestion whether I should prefer 1 or 2,
please let me know. Thanks.
On Fri, Apr 5, 2013 at 2:38 PM, Greg Hen
I just made rackjure and markdown into packages for Not-Named-Planet-2. ;)
This was easy to do! It went well (unless someone informs me it did
not go well).
Next, I want to make frog into a package.
Currently it's:
frog/
example/ # an example site -- purely example, not a unit test
I u
On Apr 4, 2013, at 4:51 PM, Tony Garnock-Jones wrote:
> I just tried to register a package with pkg.racket-lang.org. First I
> registered an account, by typing in an email address and fresh password.
>
> The next step was a webpage prompting me for "Name" and some other
> fields. I didn't realis
8 matches
Mail list logo
