When last I wrote on my problems with Scriblogify, I attributed them to
Windows 7 security... I was way too optimistic, and way too ashamed to
bother the community again. I have found a couple smoking guns since then,
and found that they, too, had nothing to do with my problem. The following
is rep
Actually I think I know why it is like the way it is now..
To get an X11 event you pass in an XEvent* to XNextEvent which copies the event
to the input pointer. Essentially
void XNextEvent(XEvent * input){
switch (event_type){
case Keyboard: {
XKeyboardEvent real_event;
mem
I agree with this. The code Laurent is talking about is my x11 ffi bindings.
Laurent, feel free to make this change and push to the repo. I'm not sure why I
didn't use the super struct thing to begin with, maybe it didn't exist when I
initially wrote the bindings.
https://github.com/kazzmir/x11
That seems like an ok solution.
I would be tempted to write
(define-cstruct _XEvent ([type _int]))
(define-cstruct (_XAnyEvent _XEvent) ([serial _ulong]
))
(define-cstruct (_XKeyEvent _XEvent) ([serial _ulong]
.
>"JM" == Jay McCarthy writes:
JM> You probably shouldn't use the 'plt-web-server' cmdline program for serious
sites.
Oh, okay. "plt-web-server" was easy usable for executing the examples in the
default-web-root, so I thought it is reasonable for my own servlets too,
because iI didn't reali
Oooohh, I think I understand now: the way it was is already sufficiently
general.
The writer of the initial code took a different direction.
Instead of defining a union type, he changes the tag of the pointer
depending on what kind of type he needs in the union:
(cpointer-push-tag! e XAnyEvent-tag)
Hi,
I am trying to convert an FFI cstruct definition into a union.
More exactly, the previous definition was :
(define-cstruct _XEvent
((type EventType)))
with EventType being defined elsewhere.
But this was an incomplete definition, and I now want to translate the
following C union:
typedef
7 matches
Mail list logo
