Some more info...
I see that I am indeed stomping on the syntax location info for the
"(or/c soundex-ordinal? #f)" syntax object, which I assume is a factor
in it being formatted badly. I still have questions.
First, I made a procedure to do a detailed dump of the syntax object:
(define (de
Can someone who knows Scribble internals point me in the right direction
on this?
I have a generated "defproc" syntax object that gets formatted badly by
Scribble, as shown in screenshot: http://i.imgur.com/FmdQr.png
The "defproc" syntax object is generated in this case by piecing
together i
See below.
On Mon, Apr 30, 2012 at 10:57 AM, Bikal Gurung wrote:
> Hi Ray,
>
> Are you using this in your day to day programming?
>
Most of my home programming is in Racket.
Work is split 75%-10%-15% Scala, R and Racket respectively.
> What sort of projects do you use this for ?
>
At work I
Try calling cipher-encrypt, which is a lower-level interface, instead
of the encrypt routine. The last part of Section 8.2 of the crypto
document is an example. Here is the example modified with padding
turned off. Note that in this case the message must a multiple of the
block size (96 in the case
On Mon, Apr 30, 2012 at 6:12 PM, Eli Barzilay wrote:
> A few minutes ago, Danny Yoo wrote:
>> I'll be releasing an update to my "outer" tutorial shortly, but
>> would like to double check that the result I'm aiming toward is of
>> good quality before I finish the text.
>
> I still think that the s
20 minutes ago, Chad Albers wrote:
> Hi,
>
> As a Ruby dev, I really like unit testing. I've been using RackUnit
> to suits my needs. I was wondering, though, about how people go
> about writing their tests for Racket. Many of the functions that I
> write will not be part of the public API that
Yesterday, Danny Yoo wrote:
> Let's say that I have the following toy iteration form for doing
> something over a sequence of numbers:
> [...]
>
> However, as Brian Mastenbrook notes, the use of syntax parameters
> here can be troublesome because they don't necessarily work
> lexically.
It's wort
Chad Albers wrote at 04/30/2012 06:38 PM:
Is there a way to run unit test against these 'private functions',
without making them public via a (provide)
You want the submodules support that is scheduled for release in Racket
5.4 in August. You can start using submodules now in the nightly buil
Hi,
As a Ruby dev, I really like unit testing. I've been using RackUnit to
suits my needs. I was wondering, though, about how people go about writing
their tests for Racket. Many of the functions that I write will not be
part of the public API that a want to share from a module. I can test the
What are DrRacket and other racket libs written in ? typed/untyped racket ?
On Mon, Apr 30, 2012 at 1:48 PM, Sam Tobin-Hochstadt wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 30, 2012 at 12:51 AM, Bikal Gurung wrote:
> > Hi All,
> >
> > I am investigating typed racket. I was wondering if someone could help
> with
> > an
A few minutes ago, Danny Yoo wrote:
> I'll be releasing an update to my "outer" tutorial shortly, but
> would like to double check that the result I'm aiming toward is of
> good quality before I finish the text.
I still think that the splicing stuff is unnecessarily(?) complicating
things... (I'm
hmmm ... I am getting some error. My repl session below. I am using 'db'
module.
> bind-prepared-statement
. Type Checker: untyped top-level identifier lifted.474 in:
bind-prepared-statement
>
Not sure what to make of it. My impression was the typed/untyped code mix
well. Am i missing something ?
I'll be releasing an update to my "outer" tutorial shortly, but would
like to double check that the result I'm aiming toward is of good
quality before I finish the text.
I've ended up with:
https://github.com/dyoo/outer-tutorial/blob/master/outer.rkt
which takes components of Eli's solution
Just now, Berthold Baeuml wrote:
> Hi,
>
> when starting a new process from racket (e.g., using subprocess) is
> there a way to set the environment for the new process, like C-libs
> execve allows? Maybe, a keyword argument could be added to
> subprocess?
A better solution IMO is how Emacs deals
Hi,
when starting a new process from racket (e.g., using subprocess) is there a way
to set the environment for the new process, like C-libs execve allows? Maybe, a
keyword argument could be added to subprocess?
All the best,
Berthold
--
> I am using the racket 'db' module to interact with my postgresql database. I
> think there is some mismatch in the documentation towards the end of section
> 1.1. Here is my sample repl session.
>
>> (define get-less-than-pst
> (prepare pgc "select n from the_numbers where n < $1"))
>
>> (que
Yesterday, Galler wrote:
>
> try this:
>
> (require mzlib/defmacro)
>
> (define-macro (distribute . (f g . rest))
> `(,g ,@(map (λ (x) `(,f ,x)) rest)))
Off-topic, but it bugs me to see posted examples that use
`define-macro'... Note that using plain macros is not only more
robust, it's a
The REPL prints types automatically:
Welcome to Racket v5.3.0.4.
-> vector-ref
- : (All (a) ((Vectorof a) Integer -> a))
#
-> (define: x : String "Hello")
-> x
- : String
"Hello"
->
Is this what you had in mind?
Vincent
At Mon, 30 Apr 2012 22:23:01 +0100,
Bikal Gurung wrote:
>
> [1 ]
> [1
Hi All,
I am using the racket 'db' module to interact with my postgresql database.
I think there is some mismatch in the documentation towards the end of
section 1.1. Here is my sample repl session.
> (define get-less-than-pst
(prepare pgc "select n from the_numbers where n < $1"))
> (query-
Sam,
Is there a function in racket which will - given a name - display the
function/variable signature in the REPL?
I am thinking about haskell prelude(REPL) that gives me the type signature
when I enter :t in the repl?
With Thanks
Bikal
On Mon, Apr 30, 2012 at 1:48 PM, Sam Tobin-Hochstadt wro
Dear Racketeers,
As we are preparing the v5.3 release, we notice unexplored corners
of new and revised features. Two concerns stand out: the addition of
sub-modules and the extensive injection of contracts into the class
hierarchy in our run-time library. In short, our changes aren't
ready for an
Interesting. What is the status of this project? Is this going to be in the
next release.
Bikal
On Mon, Apr 30, 2012 at 6:10 PM, Jay McCarthy wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 30, 2012 at 8:57 AM, Bikal Gurung wrote:
> > Hi Ray,
> >
> > Are you using this in your day to day programming? What sort of project
On Mon, Apr 30, 2012 at 8:57 AM, Bikal Gurung wrote:
> Hi Ray,
>
> Are you using this in your day to day programming? What sort of projects do
> you use this for ? Do you use untyped racket in the beginning, i.e when you
> are experimenting with ideas/algorithms and then migrate to typed racket ?
Thanks for the response, but I'm not sure if that answers my question... I now
understand that #:padding depicts an optional named parameter, but
(define dummy (encrypt cipher:aes-128 devicekey nonce #"1234567887654321"
#:padding #f))
is not accepted by Racket, so how would I do it?
Thanks!
Hi All,
Does anyone know if there is a debugger for racket that can be used outside
the dr racket environment. I use emacs in conjunction with geiser and quack
but haven't been able to find a suitable replacement with regards to
debugging from the repl.
Many Thanks
Bikal - UK
Hi Ray,
Are you using this in your day to day programming? What sort of projects do
you use this for ? Do you use untyped racket in the beginning, i.e when you
are experimenting with ideas/algorithms and then migrate to typed racket ?
Have you used typed racket when developing web applications wit
On Apr 30, 2012, at 8:23 AM, Sam Tobin-Hochstadt wrote:
>>
>> Another problem is that not all sequence types are polymorphic. For example,
>> strings are sequences, but strings can contain only characters. So what
>> would
>>
>> (sequence-map char->integer "abc")
>>
>> return? Custom sequence
User Testimonial. I migrated exclusively to TR awhile back and prefer it
immensely.
On Mon, Apr 30, 2012 at 12:51 AM, Bikal Gurung wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> I am investigating typed racket. I was wondering if someone could help
> with answering the questions below.
>
> 1) Can we mix/import modules w
On Mon, Apr 30, 2012 at 12:51 AM, Bikal Gurung wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> I am investigating typed racket. I was wondering if someone could help with
> answering the questions below.
>
> 1) Can we mix/import modules written in untyped racket to a module that is
> used typed racket. I have experimented w
At Mon, 30 Apr 2012 05:51:00 +0100,
Bikal Gurung wrote:
> 1) Can we mix/import modules written in untyped racket to a module that is
> used typed racket. I have experimented with a few modules using and they
> seem to work in general but not really sure about the mechanism that makes
> it work. How
On Sun, Apr 29, 2012 at 6:47 PM, Ryan Culpepper wrote:
> On 04/29/2012 04:33 PM, Matthias Felleisen wrote:
>>
>>
>> On Apr 29, 2012, at 6:29 PM, Asumu Takikawa wrote:
>>
>>> On 2012-04-29 12:43:48 -0400, Matthias Felleisen wrote:
What you're really saying is that sequence-map uses the wr
Thank you both!
The fixed version of the plugin has been uploaded.
To avoid cluttering this mailing list with bugs of the Script Plugin and
not of Racket or DrRacket, there is a "Report Bug" item in the script menu,
that redirects to the PLaneT bug reporter with some automatically filled in
info.
2012/4/30 Asumu Takikawa :
> On 2012-04-29 12:43:48 -0400, Matthias Felleisen wrote:
>> What you're really saying is that sequence-map uses the wrong kind of type.
>> Specifically, it should be polymorphic in the sequence constructor instead
>> of mapping everything to the top of the class hierar
33 matches
Mail list logo
