Mostly when I install something from planet, the documentation somehow gets
screwed up. For example, after I installed untyped/dispatch, I now have the
following entries in my ~/.racket/5.2.1/doc/index.html page:
(part ("(planet dispatch.scrbl (untyped dispatch.rkt 2 1) scribblings)"
"top"))
(pa
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
+1 on this.
On 03/02/2012 12:34 PM, Ray Racine wrote:
> I'd like to see more foundational libraries along the lines of
> say.
>
> - An Actor/Isolate high level message passing library over Places
> And Threads. All the necessary low-level primitives
Hi all!
I don't quite follow how Racket web app framework has grown for some
period, so not sure this may look appropriate as an potential GSoc idea.
Currently there's open PaaS platform named cloudfoundry (
www.cloudfoundry.com). It's a real cloud platform and developers could use
the supported
[In short: submissions of papers & ext'd abstracts by March 26th; TFP12
symposium June 12-14th;
Apologies for multiple copies of this call -- HWL ]
CALL FOR PAPERS
13th International Symposium
In a "define-lex-abbrev", how do I match an EOF?
For example:
BEGIN
#lang racket/base
(require parser-tools/lex
parser-tools/lex-sre)
(define-lex-abbrev my-newline-or-eof-abbrev
(: (? #\return)
(or #\newline #;eos)))
;; TODO: Need to match EOF where "#;eos" is above.
Here's another example that's starting to work, though it isn't flashy yet.
http://hashcollision.org/tmp/js-get-message/js-get-message-parent.html
I know, I don't have any design sense yet. I need help. :)
The first half of the window is a simple web-world program embedded in
an iframe,
I just pushed this to the guide. It appears under the 'macros' section, but
maybe it should go somewhere else. I have some more edits to make to the text
as well.
On 03/01/2012 01:52 PM, Matthias Felleisen wrote:
> Nice job. Now polish and add this write-up to the guide. Thanks -- Matthias
>
>
>
And something more powerful:
https://github.com/jeapostrophe/exp/blob/master/sstruct-tests.ss
Jay
On 3/5/12, Tom McNulty wrote:
> There's an example macro to do this here, although it'll only work for
> structures you define.
>
> http://www.mail-archive.com/users@racket-lang.org/msg03392.html (
Sorry if this double posts.
I just wanna say, as a new member, I'm impressed by the speed, volume, and
quality of responses in this community. Not being simply told to RTFM or
such is a really great change from many other places.
> Or use structure properties to turn them into sequences (and th
There's an example macro to do this here, although it'll only work for
structures you define.
http://www.mail-archive.com/users@racket-lang.org/msg03392.html (See Matthias'
response)
I recall this example quite well, as it was very helpful when I was learning
Racket macros.
On 2012-03-05, a
Hello,
I was wondering if Racket's struct instances can be initialized
with keywords, like in the following example written in CL:
* (defstruct foo bar baz)
FOO
* (make-foo :bar 1 :baz 2)
#S(FOO :BAR 1 :BAZ 2)
Best regards,
Dmitry
Racket Users list:
http://lists.racke
At Sun, 4 Mar 2012 20:36:23 -0800,
Helmut Rohrbacher wrote:
> The only thing is, how do you extend these properties to built-in types
> like LIST and VECTOR? I'm guessing that you'd need to wrap them in a
> user-defined type...
You could do that, or you could handle them specially in your generic
On Mon, Mar 5, 2012 at 8:18 AM, Matthias Felleisen wrote:
>
> On Mar 4, 2012, at 11:36 PM, Helmut Rohrbacher wrote:
>
>> Danny & Matthias,
>>
>> I hadn't known about structure properties. I think lumping enough syntactic
>> sugar onto your syntax definitions, Matthais, might make it feasible to
On Mar 4, 2012, at 11:36 PM, Helmut Rohrbacher wrote:
> Danny & Matthias,
>
> I hadn't known about structure properties. I think lumping enough syntactic
> sugar onto your syntax definitions, Matthais, might make it feasible to
> reproduce something to provide the functionality I'm looking for
2012/3/5 Helmut Rohrbacher
> Danny & Matthias,
>
> I hadn't known about structure properties. I think lumping enough
> syntactic sugar onto your syntax definitions, Matthais, might make it
> feasible to reproduce something to provide the functionality I'm looking
> for.
>
> The only thing is, how
15 matches
Mail list logo
