Op 1-3-2012 23:11, David Van Horn schreef:
On 3/1/12 4:45 PM, Roelof Wobben wrote:
Originele bericht
Onderwerp: Re: [racket] Is this a good design
Datum: Thu, 01 Mar 2012 10:05:25 +0100
Van: Roelof Wobben
Aan: David Van Horn
You can imagine alternative st
Matthew Flatt writes:
> At Tue, 26 Jul 2011 00:37:41 -0300, Diogo F. S. Ramos wrote:
>> Is there a documented way to extend the racket/gui language with widgets
>> already present in Gtk?
>
> Use the `get-client-handle' method of a `panel%' instance to get a
> GtkWidget pointer for the panel as a
Very nice, Jon! I too think it would be great to get this into the docs.
(There are a few typos of filename comments vs 'require's. Also, two small
comments inline below.)
Robby
On Thursday, March 1, 2012, Jon Rafkind wrote:
> Recent problems with phases have led me to investigate how they work
On 1 March 2012 17:16, Kevin Tew wrote:
> This is the magic incantation I use to use with valgrind.
>
> valgrind --tool=memcheck --db-attach=yes
> --vex-iropt-precise-memory-exns=yes --leak-check=full --num-callers=40
>
>
Thanks Kevin, I retried my test with your options, but had the same result
On 3/1/12 4:45 PM, Roelof Wobben wrote:
Originele bericht
Onderwerp: Re: [racket] Is this a good design
Datum: Thu, 01 Mar 2012 10:05:25 +0100
Van:Roelof Wobben
Aan:David Van Horn
You can imagine alternative statements of the program contract and
purpose t
There's also something of a tutorial on phases in our Scheme Workshop
2007 paper, some of which might be worth adding here. In particular,
it has some pictures/diagrams.
On Thu, Mar 1, 2012 at 3:52 PM, Matthias Felleisen wrote:
>
> Nice job. Now polish and add this write-up to the guide. Thanks
Originele bericht
Onderwerp: Re: [racket] Is this a good design
Datum: Thu, 01 Mar 2012 10:05:25 +0100
Van:Roelof Wobben
Aan:David Van Horn
You can imagine alternative statements of the program contract and
purpose that would lead to different code. One is
http://www.ccs.neu.edu/scheme/pubs/scheme2007-ctf.pdf
On Thu, Mar 1, 2012 at 4:19 PM, Jon Rafkind wrote:
> link
>
> On 03/01/2012 01:53 PM, Sam Tobin-Hochstadt wrote:
>> There's also something of a tutorial on phases in our Scheme Workshop
>> 2007 paper, some of which might be worth adding here.
On 3/1/12 4:19 PM, Jon Rafkind wrote:
link
http://lmgtfy.com/?q=sam+tobin+hochstadt+scheme+workshop
On 03/01/2012 01:53 PM, Sam Tobin-Hochstadt wrote:
There's also something of a tutorial on phases in our Scheme Workshop
2007 paper, some of which might be worth adding here. In particular,
i
link
On 03/01/2012 01:53 PM, Sam Tobin-Hochstadt wrote:
> There's also something of a tutorial on phases in our Scheme Workshop
> 2007 paper, some of which might be worth adding here. In particular,
> it has some pictures/diagrams.
>
> On Thu, Mar 1, 2012 at 3:52 PM, Matthias Felleisen
> wrote:
Mr. Rafkin, Scribble this document!
Jay
On 3/1/12, Jon Rafkind wrote:
> Recent problems with phases have led me to investigate how they work in more
> detail. Here is a brief tutorial on what they are and how they work with
> macros. The guide and reference have something to say about phases but
Nice job. Now polish and add this write-up to the guide. Thanks -- Matthias
On Mar 1, 2012, at 3:31 PM, Jon Rafkind wrote:
> Recent problems with phases have led me to investigate how they work in more
> detail. Here is a brief tutorial on what they are and how they work with
> macros. The gu
Recent problems with phases have led me to investigate how they work in more
detail. Here is a brief tutorial on what they are and how they work with
macros. The guide and reference have something to say about phases but I don't
think they go into enough detail.
Bindings exist in a phase. The l
Hi all,
We are currently putting together an application as a mentoring
organization for the Google Summer of Code 2012, which is a summer
program in which Google pays students to work on open source/free
software projects.
As part of the application, we are currently collecting project ideas
for
On Feb 29, 2012, at 5:54 PM, Neil Toronto wrote:
> On 02/29/2012 05:15 PM, John Clements wrote:
>> Plot's new "density" function is awesome. I'd like to add something to it,
>> though; independent control of the y axis.
>>
>> Here's the motivating scenario; I'm looking at server logs, to try to
The second approach only controls what happens for programs that run
in DrRacket. So I think that if you set the collection path and then
started up a DrRacket inside that DrRacket, you'd see the buttons as
you expect.
But in any case, I think raco link is probably the best approach.
Robby
On Th
On Thu, Mar 1, 2012 at 3:22 AM, Dmitry Pavlov wrote:
>
> I once implemented a DSL called "slon" in Racket.
> My programs start with "#lang slon", and I open
> them in DrRacket, edit, run, and debug them.
>
> To make Racket aware of the DSL, I can either put a symbolic
> link to my code into the st
Hello,
I once implemented a DSL called "slon" in Racket.
My programs start with "#lang slon", and I open
them in DrRacket, edit, run, and debug them.
To make Racket aware of the DSL, I can either put a symbolic
link to my code into the standard collects directory:
ln -s /home/dpavlov/work/slon
18 matches
Mail list logo
