Indeed, you're not alone! thanks to Jeff for taking care of that.
Looking forward to the announcement of the videos.
-- Éric
On Jul 27, 2011, at 9:04 PM, Stephen De Gabrielle wrote:
> Thanks,
> I'm sure I'm not the only one who appreciates the effort.
>
> S.
>
> On Wednesday, July 27, 2011,
Here are a few pictures from RacketCon 2011:
http://www.facebook.com/media/set/?set=a.10150271209024095.353114.607179094&l=14ba5f50f5&type=1
_
For list-related administrative tasks:
http://lists.racket-lang.org/listinfo/users
Thanks Matthias, thats a lot cleaner than my version.
On 2011-07-28, at 1:19 PM, Matthias Felleisen wrote:
>
> You could fake it:
>
> (require (for-syntax syntax/parse))
>
> ;; Syntax SyntaxList SyntaxList -> [Listof (list String Syntax Syntax)]
> ;; create association list mapping field n
Three hours ago, Neil Van Dyke wrote:
> BTW, if you're curious, there was some discussion about this on the
> "users" or "dev" email list, perhaps a few months ago.
>
> My impression&opinion is that we're trying to get a library that
> scales from small to large and rapid to plodding, is flexible
You could fake it:
(require (for-syntax syntax/parse))
;; Syntax SyntaxList SyntaxList -> [Listof (list String Syntax Syntax)]
;; create association list mapping field names to getters and setters [option]
(define-for-syntax (field-association-list sn getters setters)
(define sn-str
On 2011-07-28, at 12:43 PM, Eli Barzilay wrote:
> 7 minutes ago, Matthias Felleisen wrote:
>>
>> On Jul 28, 2011, at 2:10 PM, Tom McNulty wrote:
>>
>>> I was hoping that I could locate the getter (and setter) with just
>>> the field and structure type but that information doesn't seem to
>>> be
7 minutes ago, Matthias Felleisen wrote:
>
> On Jul 28, 2011, at 2:10 PM, Tom McNulty wrote:
>
> > I was hoping that I could locate the getter (and setter) with just
> > the field and structure type but that information doesn't seem to
> > be possible.
Ah, you're right.
> I don't understand yo
On Jul 28, 2011, at 2:10 PM, Tom McNulty wrote:
> I was hoping that I could locate the getter (and setter) with just the field
> and structure type but that information doesn't seem to be possible.
I don't understand your request but if you are giving me the structure name and
the structure
err... https://gist.github.com/1112122
On 2011-07-28, at 12:10 PM, Tom McNulty wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I posted a question on stackoverflow this week:
> http://stackoverflow.com/questions/6838115/racket-using-a-macro-across-modules,
> with thanks to Eli, I was able to understand where I was going
Hello,
I posted a question on stackoverflow this week:
http://stackoverflow.com/questions/6838115/racket-using-a-macro-across-modules,
with thanks to Eli, I was able to understand where I was going wrong. I took
his advice in using a struct-info alternative, and as I have limited experience
b
BTW, if you're curious, there was some discussion about this on the
"users" or "dev" email list, perhaps a few months ago.
My impression&opinion is that we're trying to get a library that scales
from small to large and rapid to plodding, is flexible enough to do
everything people want, is incl
So far with the small exposure I had to it, I liked it a lot.
+1 to have it as an alternative to RackUnit :)
[]'s
Rodolfo Carvalho
On Thu, Jul 28, 2011 at 12:20, Eli Barzilay wrote:
> It started as soemthing small (yes, "hacky") that I intended to play
> with and therefore never got any pro
It started as soemthing small (yes, "hacky") that I intended to play
with and therefore never got any proper name or a place as a library.
Since then it grew to something I have a better idea for how it should
go. So the problem is not just a lack of documentation (scribbled or
comments), it's a b
There is no scribbled documentation. -- Matthias
On Jul 28, 2011, at 10:42 AM, Jay McCarthy wrote:
> I don't think it's hacky at all. It's my favourite testing system. I'm
> not sure why it isn't more publicly documented. (There is
> documentation in the source file... however.)
>
> Jay
>
>
I don't think it's hacky at all. It's my favourite testing system. I'm
not sure why it isn't more publicly documented. (There is
documentation in the source file... however.)
Jay
On Thu, Jul 28, 2011 at 2:15 AM, Rodolfo Carvalho wrote:
> I noticed that Jay used in his code an undocumented
> modu
Hi all,
I am not a racket expert, so my problem could be
simpy due to my few knwoledge about macros.
My problem is when I am using macros and
user-defined structs.
I have defined my new structure with "make-struct-type":
; Multiset datatype definition
(define-values (s:mset make-mset mset?
I noticed that Jay used in his code an undocumented
module "tests/eli-tester" to write his test cases.
I liked the syntax, very convenient in some circumstances. However, I could
only find uses of that inside a comment
in ./collects/scribble/html/resource.rkt
Is it so hacky to be hidden and undoc
17 matches
Mail list logo
